Patna High Court
Khabir AlamversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- ALLOWED
- Bench
- ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
Holding
The Court granted bail to the petitioner, directing the furnishing of a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties.
Summary
The petitioner, Khabir Alam, a rickshaw puller, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 64 and 62 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, Sections 3, 4 and 5 of the Immoral Traffic Prevention Act and Sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleged that he was found in a hotel room with a 35‑year‑old woman during a raid, suggesting involvement in a prostitution racket. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, had no criminal record, and that the seizure was conducted by an officer below the rank authorized under the Immoral Traffic Act. The State opposed bail. After hearing both sides, the Court found the petitioner's claim of innocence credible and noted the procedural irregularity, and therefore ordered that bail be granted on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties.
Issues considered
- Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner despite the serious nature of the offences under the B.N.S., Immoral Traffic Prevention Act and POCSO Act.
- Whether the alleged procedural lapse—seizure by an officer below the rank prescribed under the Immoral Traffic Prevention Act—affects the grant of bail.
Legislation cited
- Bihar Narcotic Substances Act — s. 62, 64
- Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act — s. 3, 4, 5
- Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act — s. 12, 8
Subjects
- bail
- criminal procedure
- Immoral Traffic Prevention Act
- POCSO Act
- procedural irregularity
- seizure authority
- serious offences
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17814 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2 Year-2026 Thana- GHORASAHAN District- East Champaran
======================================================
Khabir Alam, Son of Kaimuddin Mian @ Kaiyamudin Miyan, Resident of
village - Bakuliya, P.S.- Ghorasahan, District- East Champaran
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ajay Kumar Singh, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
ORAL ORDER
2 23-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with
Ghorasahan P.S. Case No.02 of 2026 registered for the offence
punishable under Sections 64 and 62 of B.N.S., Sections 3, 4 and 5
of Immoral Traffic Prevention Act and Sections 8 and 12 of
POCSO Act.
3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the
informant raided Royal Lovely Family Resort and Gift General
Store at Ghorasahan on information along with other police
personnel. It is alleged that the petitioner was found with a lady
aged about 35 years in a room. On being asked, it was disclosed
that the owner of the hotel Subodh Pandit has called the ladies on
the promise that they will be paid if they will establish physical
relationship with the customers.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17814 of 2026(2) dt.23-03-2026
2/2
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner
has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no
offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. The petitioner
is a rickshaw puller who was being called by the lady and he was
not apprehended in the room. He is having no criminal antecedent
and he is languishing in judicial custody since 07.01.2026. It has
further been submitted that in Immoral Traffic Act, no officer
below the rank of Inspector can make seizure and the I.O. is
S.H.O. who is of the rank of S.I.
5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently
opposed the application for bail.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and
considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is
inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named
petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond
of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the
like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 6 th Additional
Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, POCSO, Motihari at East
Champaran in connection with Ghorasahan P.S. Case No. 02 of
2026.
(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
lata/-
U T
Checking your session…