Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Nitesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court ordered that bail be granted to the petitioners subject to the stipulated conditions.

Summary

The petitioners, Nitesh Kumar and Sonu Kumar, sought bail after being implicated in a case under Section 5 of the B.N.S. and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 51.84 litres of foreign liquor seized from a motorcycle. Villagers identified them as the individuals who fled the scene, but the petitioners contended that they neither owned nor had physical possession of the motorcycle or the liquor. The first petitioner has no prior criminal record, while the second has a past conviction unrelated to the present charge. The State opposed the bail application, arguing the seriousness of the offence. The court, after considering the facts, granted bail to both petitioners on a bond of Rs.10,000 each with two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioners under Section 5 of the B.N.S. and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • Whether the petitioners' alleged lack of possession and ownership justifies bail

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • foreign liquor
  • seizure
  • suspicion
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • narcotic substances
  • arrest apprehension

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18002 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-23 Year-2026 Thana- KATHAIYA District- Muzaffarpur
                 ======================================================
           1.     Nitesh Kumar S/O Laddu Rai @ Sujeet Rai @ Dhananjay Kumar Yadav
                  R/O Vill.- Lohi Nawalpur, Thatitan @ Thatiyan, P.S.- Kathaiya, Dist.-
                  Muzaffarpur.
           2.     Sonu Kumar S/O Lalan Rai @ Lalan Prasad Yadav R/O Vill.- Lohi
                  Nawalpur, Thatitan @ Thatiyan, P.S.- Kathaiya, Dist.- Muzaffarpur.
                                                                               ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                   Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Arvind Kumar
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Abhay Kumar
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   03-04-2026                      Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and

                   learned APP for the State.

                                   2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a

                   case registered for the offence punishable under Section (5) of

                   the B.N.S. and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise

                   Act.

                                   3. Perusal of the first information report and the

                   seizure list, would go to show that 51.840 liters of foreign liquor

                   is said to have been recovered from the motorcycle and it has

                   been alleged that the petitioners were identified by some local

                   villagers as the persons who fled away leaving behind the

                   motorcycle.

                                   4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18002 of 2026(2) dt.03-04-2026
                                                         2/2




                       petitioners that there is no recovery from the physical and

                       conscious possession of the petitioners. The petitioners are

                       neither the owners of the said motorcycle nor are concerned

                       with the same. They have only been implicated on suspicion

                       and village politics. Further, the petitioner no. 1 has no criminal

                       antecedent however, petitioner no. 2 has one criminal antecedent

                       but not of the same nature.

                                         5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for

                       bail.

                                    6.       Taking into consideration the facts and

                       circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners in the

                       event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below

                       within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on

                       furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand)

                       each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction

                       of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor

                       court in connection with Kathaiya P.S. Case No. 23 of 2026,

                       subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of

                       the Cr.P.C./482(2) of the B.N.S.S.


                                                 (Soni Shrivastava, J)
devendra/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.