Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Prakash Singh @ Prakash Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner subject to a bond and conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

Summary

Petitioner Prakash Singh sought bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022 for allegedly selling country-made liquor. The police seized 16 litres of liquor and, based on statements of two arrested individuals, identified the petitioner as involved, though he claimed the liquor was seized from a public area and he had no connection. He argued that the seizure list was not prepared in accordance with Section 103 of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act (B.N.S.S.) and highlighted a prior similar criminal case for which he was on bail. The State opposed the bail application. The High Court, after considering the submissions, ordered that the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. and verification of his criminal antecedent.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner pending trial under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022.
  • Whether the identification of the petitioner complied with procedural requirements of Section 103 of the B.N.S.S.
  • Whether the petitioner’s prior criminal antecedent warrants denial of bail.

Subjects

  • bail
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • Section 30(a)
  • seizure of liquor
  • procedural lapse
  • Section 103
  • Section 482(2)
  • criminal antecedent

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18085 of 2026
                          Arising Out of PS. Case No.-7 Year-2026 Thana- BHELDI District- Saran
                 ======================================================
                 Prakash Singh @ Prakash Kumar Singh S/o- Ramsnehi Singh R/o village -
                 Titara , P.s- Parsa, District- Saran

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Ravi Prakash, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Umanath Mishra, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RITESH KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   25-03-2026                  Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the

                   learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection

                   with Bheldi P.S. Case No.07/2026, for having allegedly

                   committed offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition

                   and Excise Act, 2022.

                                3. As per the prosecution story, the informant along

                   with other police personnel was on patrolling duty and on secret

                   information that the petitioner is selling country made liquor

                   near a Babul tree of village Khardahan, reached the place of

                   occurrence and on seeing the police, three persons fled away,

                   however on chase, two persons were arrested and one person

                   succeeded in fleeing away. The arrested persons disclosed the

                   name of the petitioner and on search, total 16 litres of country
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18085 of 2026(2) dt.25-03-2026
                                            2/3




          made liquor was recovered, out of which, 2 litres was recovered

          from the pocket of the arrested persons and 14 litres from a

          plastic bag.

                       4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

          the petitioner has got no concern with the said seized liquor and

          the liquor has been seized from an open place accessible to all.

          The name of the petitioner transpired on the basis of the

          confession made by the other accused persons who were

          arrested at the place of occurrence, with whom the petitioner has

          got no concern and while preparing the seizure list, the

          procedure contained under Section 103 of the B.N.S.S. was not

          followed. The petitioner has got one criminal antecedent of the

          similar nature in which he is on bail.

                       5. The learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer

          for bail.

                       6. Having considered the rival submissions, let the

          petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender

          within a period of six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing a

          bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two

          sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

          Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Exclusive Special Court Excise

          Act-I, Saran at Chapra in connection with Bheldi P.S. Case
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18085 of 2026(2) dt.25-03-2026
                                                           3/3




                         No.07/2026, subject to the conditions laid down under Section

                         482(2) of the B.N.S.S. with a further condition that:-

                                      The court below shall verify the criminal antecedent

                         of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the

                         petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court

                         below shall take steps for cancellation of bail bond of the

                         petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bond in terms of the

                         above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in

                         the name of verification.


                                                     (Ritesh Kumar, J.)

Sanjay/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.