Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Abhishek Sinha @ Abhishek Kumar SinhaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

A transport commission agent who merely facilitates the hire of a truck and has no control over the goods cannot be held liable for the alleged misappropriation and is entitled to bail.

Summary

The petitioner, Abhishek Sinha, a transport commission agent, was apprehended in connection with a case alleging misappropriation of goods worth Rs.5,00,000 loaded on a truck. The prosecution alleged that the truck driver and owner misappropriated the goods, and the petitioner was charged under Sections 318(4), 316(2), 303(2) and 3(5) of the BNS. The petitioner contended that his role was limited to arranging the truck and that he had no control over the goods or the truck, and he had no criminal antecedent. The State opposed bail, but the court noted that the truck had already been seized and the petitioner’s involvement was merely as a commission agent. Consequently, the court granted bail on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to verification of antecedents and conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

Issues considered

  • What is the extent of liability of a transport commission agent in a case of alleged misappropriation of goods?
  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail despite the serious nature of the charges under the BNS.

Legislation cited

  • BNS — s. 303(2), 316(2), 318(4), 3(5)
  • B.N.S.S. — s. 482(2)

Subjects

  • bail
  • transport commission agent
  • misappropriation of goods
  • Section 482
  • criminal antecedent
  • commission agent liability

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18144 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-31 Year-2025 Thana- DARBHANGA SADAR District-
                                                        Darbhanga
                 ======================================================
                 Abhishek Sinha @ Abhishek Kumar Sinha Son of Ashok Kumar Sinha
                 Resident of Mohalla - Anand Nagar, Kamre Hehal, P.S.- Hehal, District -
                 Ranchi, Jharkhand.                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                Versus
                 The State of Bihar                             ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Alok Kumar, Advocate
                                          :      Mr. Sudhir Kumar Sinha, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RITESH KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   25-03-2026                          Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   the learned APP for the State.

                                    2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in

                   connection with Sadar P.S. Case No. 31 of 2025, for allegedly

                   having committed offence under Sections 318(4), 316(2), 303(2)

                   and 3(5) of the BNS.

                                    3. As per the prosecution case, goods worth

                   Rs.5,00,000/- were loaded on a truck bearing registration no.

                   CG07CT-8537 by the driver of the said truck which was to

                   reach Orissa, but the same did not reach the destination place

                   and upon repeated calls on the mobile number of the driver, the

                   same was found to be switched of. Then the informant talked to

                   the owner of the truck, but the number of the owner of the truck

                   was also switched off. It was alleged by the informant that the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18144 of 2026(2) dt.25-03-2026
                                            2/3




          transport company, the owner of the truck and the driver are

          involved in misappropriation of the goods and they have sold

          the same for their illegal gain.

                          4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits

          that the petitioner is a transport agent and his only duty was to

          provide the truck by facilitating in between the informant and

          the owner of the the truck. The petitioner has got no concern

          either with the truck or with the materials, which was loaded on

          the said truck. The truck was later on seized by the police and

          misappropriation, if any, has been caused by the owner and the

          driver of the truck and the petitioner being transport commission

          agent, is not at all involved in the said misappropriation. The

          petitioner has got no criminal antecedent.

                          5. The learned APP for the State vehemently

          opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

                          6. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties

          and after considering the fact that the petitioner is only a

          commission agent/transport agent, who only facilitated the truck

          to the informant through the owner, for which he got a meager

          amount towards his commission and further the truck has

          already been seized by the Police, let the petitioner, above

          named, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of six
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18144 of 2026(2) dt.25-03-2026
                                                      3/3




                    weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.

                    10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

                    each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate,

                    Darbhanga in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No. 31 of 2025,

                    subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of

                    the B.N.S.S., with further condition:

                                 (1) The learned Court concerned shall verify the

                    criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it

                    is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal

                    antecedents, the court concerned shall take steps for cancellation

                    of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail

                    bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be

                    delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.



                                                (Ritesh Kumar, J)
AjayMishra/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.