Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Suraj Kumar @ Suraj Kumar RaiversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

The application for regular bail was dismissed.

Summary

The petitioner, Suraj Kumar, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 61(2), 103(1), 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Sections 25(1‑B)a, 26, 35 and 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that two persons were killed and that the petitioner was in constant contact with the shooters during the crime. The petitioner has been in custody since 4 October 2025 and also faces three other charges, including two Rangdari offences and one murder. Considering the seriousness of the alleged offences, the petitioner’s alleged involvement, and his criminal antecedents, the court was not inclined to grant bail. Consequently, the bail application was dismissed.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail should be granted to the petitioner given the nature of the offences and his alleged involvement
  • Whether the petitioner’s criminal antecedents justify denial of bail

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • regular bail
  • bail denial
  • criminal antecedents
  • murder
  • arms act
  • narcotic act
  • Rangdari
  • high court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18188 of 2026
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-258 Year-2025 Thana- BHELDI District- Saran
                 ======================================================
                 Suraj Kumar @ Suraj Kumar Rai S/O Sanjay Rai @ Sanjay Kumar Roy
                 Resident of Vill.- Patrahi kala, P.S.- Bheldi, Dist.- Saran at Chapra

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Amir Alam
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr.Arun Kumar Pandey
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

6   25-06-2026                    Heard the parties.

                                2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with

                   Bheldi P.S. Case No. 258 of 2025 registered for the offence

                   under Sections 61(2), 103(1), 3(5) of the BNS and under

                   Sections 25(1-B)a, 26, 35 and 27 of the Arms Act.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, two persons have been

                   killed and it has come during investigation that the petitioner

                   was in constant touch with the shooters at the time of the

                   commission of crime.

                                4. The petitioner is in custody since 4.10.2025 and he

                   is accused in three more cases out of which two are of Rangdari

                   and one case is of murder.

                                5. Considering the allegation levelled against the

                   petitioner and also considering the criminal antecedents of the
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18188 of 2026(6) dt.25-06-2026
                                                      2/2




                    petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the

                    petitioner.

                                  6. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed.



                                                             (Sandeep Kumar, J)
Vikas/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.