Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Pappu TiwariversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner subject to specified conditions.

Summary

Pappu Tiwari was arrested on 12 January 2026 in connection with an excise case involving the seizure of 151 litres of country-made liquor, alleged to be an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. The petitioner contended that the liquor was recovered from an open bush and not from his possession, and that his name was supplied only by local villagers, asserting that the FIR was fabricated. The prosecution opposed bail, noting a similar pending case against the petitioner, though he was already on bail in that matter. The High Court, after considering the lack of direct material linking the petitioner to the seized liquor and the circumstances of his custody, granted bail on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions of cooperation, appearance, non‑tampering with evidence, and verification of criminal antecedents. The bail order emphasized that any violation of these conditions could lead to cancellation of the bond.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner in an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 given the facts of the case.
  • Whether there is sufficient material linking the petitioner to the seized liquor to justify continued detention.
  • Whether the petitioner poses a risk of tampering with evidence or witnesses.

Subjects

  • bail
  • excise
  • illegal liquor
  • Section 30(a)
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • criminal procedure
  • false implication

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18343 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-858 Year-2025 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Gopalganj
                 ======================================================
                 Pappu Tiwari S/o Uma Tiwari R/o Badi Khajuriya, P.S.- Bhore, District-
                 Gopalganj

                                                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Sunil Kumar Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr.Mukesh Kumar Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   24-03-2026                      Heard Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh, learned counsel for

                   the petitioner and Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, learned Additional

                   Public Prosecutor for the State.

                               2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since

                   12.01.2026 in connection with Gopalganj Excise P.S. Case No.

                   858 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 24.12.2025                          for the offences

                   punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and

                   Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022.

                               3. Recovery is of 151 liters of country made liquor.

                               4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the

                   present case. The allegation as alleged in the F.I.R is false and

                   fabricated and the petitioner has not committed any offence as

                   alleged in the F.I.R. He further submits that it appears from the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18343 of 2026(2) dt.24-03-2026
                                            2/3




          F.I.R. as well as seizure list that nothing has been recovered

          from the conscious possession of the petitioner rather altogether

          151 litres of country made liquor has been recovered from the

          bush and the same is an open place. He further submits that

          name of the petitioner has been transpired on the basis of the

          disclosure made by the local villagers and except the aforesaid,

          no other material has come during investigation which suggest

          the involvement of the petitioner in the present occurrence. The

          petitioner is in custody since 12.01.2026.

                      5     Learned      Additional        Public   Prosecutor   has

          vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and

          submits that the petitioner carries one more case of similar

          nature other than the present one but fairly submits that he is on

          bail in the pending matter.

                       6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances,

          let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing

          bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of

          the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned District &

          Additional Sessions Judge-IV-cum-Exclusive Special Excise

          Court-II, Gopalganj in connection with Gopalganj Excise P.S.

          Case No. 858 of 2025, subject to the following conditions:-

                          i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18343 of 2026(2) dt.24-03-2026
                                                        3/3




                       properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court

                       and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and

                       on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient

                       reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

                                    ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the

                       witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to

                       move for cancellation of bail.

                                   iii. And further condition that the court below shall

                      verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at

                      any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his

                      criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for

                      cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the

                      acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order

                      shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of

                      verification.



                                             (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Vanisha/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.