Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Chandan Kumar @ Chandan Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail is granted to the petitioner subject to a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and verification of criminal antecedents under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

Summary

Chandan Kumar was arrested in connection with a case alleging transport of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The police seized 4 litres of country-made liquor from a motorcycle and 176 litres from a car, and a confessional statement of an arrested accomplice implicated the petitioner. The petitioner denied any involvement, claimed no criminal antecedent, and sought bail. The State opposed the bail application. The High Court, after hearing both sides, granted bail on the condition of a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties and subject to verification of the petitioner’s criminal antecedents under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., with provisions for cancellation if false information is discovered.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner in the alleged offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • Whether the petitioner poses a risk of fleeing or tampering with evidence
  • Whether the conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. are applicable

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • illicit liquor
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • Section 30(a)
  • Section 482(2)
  • criminal antecedent
  • excise
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18443 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-549 Year-2025 Thana- BHORE District- Gopalganj
                 ======================================================
                 Chandan Kumar @ Chandan Kumar Singh Son of Babulal Singh R/o Village
                 - Jagdish Bantariya, P.S. - Bhore, District - Gopalganj.

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Suresh Prasad Bhakta, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Pradeep Narain Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RITESH KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   25-03-2026                         Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   the learned APP for the State.

                                   2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in

                   connection with Bhorey P.S. Case No. 549 of 2025 for allegedly

                   having committed offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar

                   Prohibition and Excise Act.

                                   3. As per the prosecution case, while the informant

                   was on patrolling duty, he got secret information that illicit

                   liquor is being carried out by the petitioner. Upon such

                   information, the police personnel reached near the place of

                   occurrence and started waiting for the car to come. On seeing

                   the Police party, three persons started fleeing away, however one

                   person was apprehended by the Police along with motorcycle,

                   while two persons managed to flee away from the place of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18443 of 2026(2) dt.25-03-2026
                                            2/3




          occurrence. On the confessional statement made by the arrested

          person, the name of the petitioner transpired in the case. From

          the dicky of the motorcycle, 4 litres of country made liquor and

          from the car having registration no. UP32CV4369, 176 litres of

          country made liquor was recovered.

                          4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits

          that the petitioner has not committed any offence. The petitioner

          has got no concern with the alleged seized liquor or with the car

          and motorcycle in question. The petitioner has got no criminal

          antecedent.

                          5. The learned APP for the State opposes the prayer

          for bail of the petitioner.

                          6. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties,

          let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or

          surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks,

          be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten

          Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

          satisfaction of the learned District and Additional Sessions

          Judge-XIII-Cum-Special             Judge,      Excise-I,   Gopalganj   in

          connection with Bhorey P.S. Case No. 549 of 2025, subject to

          the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the

          B.N.S.S., with further condition:
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18443 of 2026(2) dt.25-03-2026
                                                       3/3




                                  (1) The learned Court concerned shall verify the

                     criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it

                     is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal

                     antecedents, the court concerned shall take steps for cancellation

                     of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail

                     bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be

                     delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.



                                                 (Ritesh Kumar, J)
AjayMishra/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.