Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sintu Singh @ Ashok SinghversusThe State Of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

A criminal appeal dismissed for default may be restored if the petitioners demonstrate unavoidable circumstances and subsequently file the required jointness petition.

Summary

The petitioners filed a restoration petition seeking to revive Criminal Appeal (SJ) No. 4022 of 2022, which had been dismissed for default by a peremptory order dated 14-11-2024. The original order had required the petitioners to file a jointness petition within three weeks, but they failed to do so due to unavoidable circumstances. The petitioners subsequently filed the jointness petition on 16-12-2024 and requested that the appeal be restored to its original file. The Court examined the reasons for the delay and found them satisfactory. Consequently, the Court allowed the restoration petition, thereby reinstating the criminal appeal to its original file.

Issues considered

  • Whether a criminal appeal dismissed for default can be restored when the petitioners file the required jointness petition after the statutory deadline due to unavoidable circumstances.

Subjects

  • restoration of appeal
  • criminal procedure
  • default dismissal
  • procedural delay
  • jointness petition

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18457 of 2025
                                               In
                                 CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.4022 of 2022
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-336 Year-2021 Thana- MADANPUR District- Aurangabad
                 ======================================================
           1.     Sintu Singh @ Ashok Singh S/O Suresh Singh R/O Vill.- Ratanpura, P.S.-
                  Madanpur, Dist.- Aurangabad.
           2.    Mithilesh Singh S/O Suresh Singh R/O Vill.- Ratanpura, P.S.- Madanpur,
                 Dist.- Aurangabad.
           3.    Ankit Kumar Singh @ Monu Kumar @ Ankit Kumar Singh S/O Savindra
                 Singh R/O Vill.- Ratanpura, P.S.- Madanpur, Dist.- Aurangabad.
           4.    Rakesh Singh S/O Suresh Singh R/O Vill.- Ratanpura, P.S.- Madanpur,
                 Dist.- Aurangabad.
           5.    Santosh Kumar Sharma S/O Late Ramanand Sharma R/O Vill.- Ratanpura,
                 P.S.- Madanpur, Dist.- Aurangabad.
           6.    Deepak Sao S/O Mahangu Sao R/O Vill.- Ratanpura, P.S.- Madanpur, Dist.-
                 Aurangabad.
           7.    Manoranjan Kumar Yadav S/O Lakhan Yadav R/O Vill.- Ratanpura, P.S.-
                 Madanpur, Dist.- Aurangabad.

                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
           1.    The State Of Bihar Patna
           2.    Sheopujan Sharma S/O Late Alakdeo Sharma R/O Vill.- Ratanpura, P.S.-
                 Madanpur, Dist.- Aurangabad.

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Kamlendra Prasad Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Md. Aslam Ansari , APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   18-02-2026                Instant restoration petition has been filed for restoration

                   of Cr. Appeal (SJ) No. 4022 of 2022 which stood dismissed

                   for default vide per-emptory order dated 14.11.2024 .

                                2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that

                   vide order dated 14.11.2024, petitioners were directed to file
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18457 of 2025(2) dt.18-02-2026
                                                        2/2




                      jointness petition within three weeks but due to unavoidable

                      circumstances, the same could not be filed within the stipulated

                      time. But, now, the same has been filed on 16.12.2024 and as

                      such learned counsel for petitioners seeks restoration of Cr.

                      Appeal ( SJ) No. 4022 of 2022 to its original file .

                                   3. In view of the aforesaid facts and reasons

                      mentioned in the restoration petition, the same is allowed.

                                   4. Thus, Cr. Appeal (SJ) No. 4022         of   2022 is

                      restored to its original file .



                                            (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Koushik/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.