Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sadhu Bhagat @ Sadhu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that anticipatory bail should be granted as the accusations were vague, injuries were minor, and parity with a co‑accused who had been bailed.

Summary

The petitioner, Sadhu Bhagat, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita relating to a land‑dispute‑driven assault. The FIR alleged that the accused, armed with lathis and a pistol, assaulted an informant, causing head injuries. The petitioner contended he was innocent, the allegations were general and omnibus, and the injuries were simple, citing that a co‑accused had already been granted bail. The State opposed the bail. The court, noting the vague nature of the accusations, the parity with the co‑accused, and the minor injuries, allowed anticipatory bail subject to a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, under Section 482 of the B.N.S.S., for a period of eight weeks.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail can be granted under Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita in view of the general and omnibus nature of the allegations.
  • Whether the petitioner’s alleged involvement and the nature of injuries justify denial of anticipatory bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Section 482
  • Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • land dispute
  • assault
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18537 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-109 Year-2025 Thana- PIPRIYA District- Lakhisarai
                 ======================================================
                 Sadhu Bhagat @ Sadhu Kumar S/o Kapil Bhagat R/o Village- Pathua, PS-
                 Pipariya, Distt.- Lakhisarai, Bihar

                                                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus

                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner       :        Mr. Rabi Bhushan, Advocate
                 For the State            :        Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   04-05-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case

                   registered for the offence under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1),

                   351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita.

                                3. As per F.I.R., on 09.12.2025 at 6 AM, all the named

                   accused persons, including this petitioner, armed with lathi,

                   danda, iron rod and pistol, abused and assaulted informant and

                   also caused injury on the head of informant with intention to kill

                   him, but anyhow informant could saved his life. The motive

                   behind the occurrence is stated to be land dispute.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. As a
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18537 of 2026(2) dt.04-05-2026
                                            2/3




          matter of fact, on account of admitted land dispute between the

          parties, a simple altercation took place. Allegation of assault is

          general and omnibus and no specific accusation of overt act has

          been alleged against this petitioner. Doctor has found the

          injuries, allegedly caused by this petitioner, simple in nature. It

          is further submitted that similarly situated co-accused person

          has already been granted bail by this Hon’ble Court vide order

          dated 23.02.2026 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 8476 of 2026.

                        5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently

          opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the

          petitioner.

                        6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the

          case, general and omnibus nature of accusation, claim based on

          parity and nature of injuries allegedly caused by this petitioner,

          the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is

          allowed.

                        7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within

          a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named

          petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.

          10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

          each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate,

          Lakhisarai in connection with Pipariya P.S. Case No. 109 of
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18537 of 2026(2) dt.04-05-2026
                                                         3/3




                       2025, subject to condition, as laid down under Section 482 of

                       the B.N.S.S..



                                             (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
shashank/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.