Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Krishna Bind @ Boby DeolversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted bail to the petitioner subject to strict conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Krishna Bind, was arrested in connection with a police case alleging harassment, threats, and assault under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution’s informant claimed the petitioner threatened a girl and assaulted her father, leading to the FIR. The petitioner argued that the FIR was exaggerated, he had no prior criminal record, and he was a young individual, offering to give an undertaking not to harass the victim or possess a truck. The State opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the allegations. Considering the petitioner’s prolonged pre‑trial custody, lack of antecedents, and the undertaking offered, the Court inclined to grant bail with stringent conditions, including a bond, sureties, regular appearances before the trial court and police, and a prohibition on tampering with evidence or committing further offences. The bail order was conditioned on immediate cancellation if any violation occurred.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner despite the serious nature of the offences under the B.N.S and POCSO Acts
  • Whether the petitioner’s lack of criminal antecedent and the duration of pre‑trial custody justify bail

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • POCSO
  • criminal procedure
  • pre‑trial detention
  • harassment
  • assault
  • court conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18607 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-60 Year-2026 Thana- ARA NAGAR District- Bhojpur
                 ======================================================
                 Krishna Bind @ Boby Deol S/o- Ganesh Bind @ Ganesh Prasad R/v- Bind
                 Toli Ps- Ara Town Dist- Bhojpur

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.    ABC D/o- Rahul Bind R/v- Bind Toli Ps- Ara Town Dist- Bhojpur

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Manoj Kumar, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Madan Kumar, APP.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   13-05-2026                  Heard Mr. Manoj Kumar, learned counsel for the

                   petitioner and the State.

                                2. The petitioner is in custody in connection with

                   Arrah Town P.S. Case No. 60/2026 for the offence punishable

                   under sections 126(2), 115(2), 76, 352, 351(2), 351(3), 3(5) of

                   B.N.S and 8, 12 of POCSO Act.

                                3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged

                   that this petitioner used to harass her and on one day, threw a

                   piece of paper having his mobile number. When her mother tried

                   to counsel him, he threatened of dire consequence unless she is

                   married to him. Allegation is of the year 24.01.2026, along with

                   his friends, he assaulted the informant’s father. This led to the

                   FIR.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18607 of 2026(3) dt.13-05-2026
                                            2/4




                       4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that an

          exaggerated FIR is there, petitioner has no criminal antecedent,

          is a young person, if granted relief, he shall be giving an

          undertaking before the Court while executing the bail bond that

          he shall not have any truck and/or shall harass the girl/family

          members in any manner. Failure to do so, steps can be taken for

          cancellation of his bail bond. The further submission is that

          charges have been framed and is in custody since 26.01.2026.

                       5. In this case, the Co-ordinate Bench had issued

          notice to the opposite party no. 2 but as per the office notes, she

          refused to accept it. The same, as such, has been deemed to have

          delivered.

                       6. Learned APP opposes the prayer for bail submitting

          that he has harassed the girl a lot.

                       7. Allegation is grave against the petitioner and he

          made the life of the victim miserable. However, considering the

          fact that he has remained in custody since 26.01.2026, has no

          criminal antecedent, is a young boy, an undertaking has been

          given that he shall have no truck with the girl, charges have

          been framed, in that background, this Court is inclined to extend

          him the privilege of bail with conditions.

                       8. It is made clear that if in any manner, the petitioner
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18607 of 2026(3) dt.13-05-2026
                                            3/4




          or his family members and/or his friends come anyway near the

          girl and/or his family members, State shall be taking immediate

          steps for the cancellation of his bail bond.

                       9. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing

          bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties

          of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive

          Special Court POCSO cum D.J.S.J VI, Bhojpur at Ara                in

          connection with Arrah Town P.S. Case No. 60/2026 subject to

          the following conditions:

                       (i) one of the bailor should be the family

          member/relative of the petitioner who shall provide official

          document to show his/her bona fide;

                       (ii) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date

          before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive

          dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his

          bail bond by the Trial Court itself;

                       (iii) the petitioner shall appear before the concerned

          police station every fortnight for six months to mark his

          attendance and at the end of the period, the certificate be

          submitted to the Court;

                       (iv) the petitioner shall in no way try to induce or

          promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences,
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18607 of 2026(3) dt.13-05-2026
                                                        4/4




                      failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for

                      cancellation of the bail bonds;

                                   (v) the petitioner shall desist from committing any

                      criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty

                      to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.



                                                     (Rajiv Roy, J)
Vijay
Singh/Sanny Patel

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.