Naveen Kumar @ Naveen Yadav @ Navin KumarversusThe State of Bihar

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1865 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-169 Year-2025 Thana- Singhaul District- Begusarai
                 ======================================================
                 Naveen Kumar @ Naveen Yadav @ Navin Kumar Son of Hiralal Yadav
                 Resident of Village- Sushil Nagar, P.S.- Singhaul in the district of Begusarai

                                                                                      ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :         Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :         Mr. Nagendra Prasad, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   19-01-2026                  Heard Mr. Sunil Kumar, learned counsel for the

                   petitioner and Mr. Nagendra Prasad, learned Additional Public

                   Prosecutor for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since

                   15.11.2025 in connection with Singhaul P.S. Case No. 169 of

                   2025, F.I.R. dated 15.10.2025 for the offences punishable under

                   Sections 115(1), 126(2), 352, 351(2), 109(1), 3(5) of the B.N.S.

                                3. According to prosecution case, petitioner and other

                   co-accused persons are alleged to have intercepted the informant

                   and started assaulting him by iron rod, khanti, lathi, bricks etc.

                   Petitioner is alleged to have assaulted one Ajay Yadav on his

                   head by Khanti due to which he suffered head injury.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner has clean antecedent and and the allegation as alleged
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1865 of 2026(2) dt.19-01-2026
                                            2/3




          is false and fabricated. Although, the petitioner is named in the

          F.I.R. and the allegation against him is that he assaulted one

          Ajay Yadav on his head by means of khanti blow and Ajay

          Yadav receives head injury. There is case and counter case and

          petitioner side also received injury in the counter case and the

          co-accused Sabo Devi, Fudo Devi, Pinkesh Kumar and others

          have been granted bail by lower court itself. The petitioner is in

          custody since 15.11.2025.

                       5. Learned APP for the State have vehemently

          opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

                       6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances,

          petitioner has clean antecedent and there is case and counter

          case, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on

          furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two

          sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

          Additional       Chief      Judicial     Magistrate-IV,   Begusarai   in

          connection with Singhaul P.S. Case No. 169 of 2025, with the

          following conditions:

                       i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be

          properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court

          and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and

          on her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1865 of 2026(2) dt.19-01-2026
                                                        3/3




                      reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

                                   ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the

                      witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move

                      for cancellation of bail.

                                   iii. And further condition that the court below shall

                      verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at

                      any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his

                      criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for

                      cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the

                      acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order

                      shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of

                      verification.


                                                 (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)

Ranjeet/-

U      T