Patna High Court
Animesh KeshriversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL REJECTED
- Bench
- PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
Holding
Anticipatory bail was not granted to the petitioner.
Summary
The petitioner, Animesh Keshri, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 21(b) and 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act. The FIR alleged that 60.71 grams of brown sugar were recovered from his residence. The petitioner also has a prior criminal antecedent. The court examined the seriousness of the offence, the quantity of narcotics involved, and the petitioner’s criminal history. Considering these factors, the court concluded that the petitioner did not merit the protection of anticipatory bail. Consequently, the prayer for anticipatory bail was rejected, and the petition was dismissed.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under the NDPS Act in view of the quantity of narcotics seized and his prior criminal antecedent.
Legislation cited
- Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act — s. 21(b), 22
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- NDPS Act
- drug possession
- criminal antecedent
- bail petition
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1869 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-92 Year-2025 Thana- TATARPUR District- Bhagalpur
======================================================
Animesh Keshri S/o Amulya Keshri Resident of Village- Laheri Tola
Kajwalichak, P.S.- Tatarpur, District- Bhagalpur
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Arun Kumar Gupta
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Yogendra Kumar
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
ORAL ORDER
2 29-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
A.P.P for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case,
registered for offence punishable under Sections 21(b), 22 of the
N.D.P.S. Act.
3. As per F.I.R., 60.71 gram Brown Sugar was
recovered from the house of this petitioner. Petitioner has got
one criminal antecedent.
4. Considering the same, the prayer for anticipatory
bail of petitioner is rejected.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
anay/-
U T
Checking your session…