Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Umrawati Devi @ Umarawati DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court held that bail should be granted to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Umrawati Devi, was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 50 litres of illicit country-made liquor recovered from a public area. She claimed innocence, argued that the liquor was not found in her possession, that the recovery was from an open place, and that procedural requirements under Section 103 of the B.N.S.S. were not complied with. The State opposed the bail application. The Court considered the facts, the petitioner’s clean record, and the procedural contentions, and ordered that she be released on regular bail upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount. The application for bail was therefore allowed.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
  • Whether the procedural requirements of Section 103 of the B.N.S.S. were complied with in the investigation.
  • Whether the fact that the liquor was recovered from an open place affects the bail eligibility.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • regular bail
  • excise law
  • illicit liquor
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • Section 30(a)
  • Section 103
  • procedural compliance
  • women detainee

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18849 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-127 Year-2025 Thana- Excise Mashrakh District- Saran
                 ======================================================
                 Umrawati Devi @ Umarawati Devi W/O Ambica Sah @ Amika Sah R/O
                 Vill.- Repura, P.S.- Marhowrah, Dist.- Saran.

                                                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                 The State of Bihar Patna

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Abhijeet Abhigyan, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Shantanu Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   25-03-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   A.P.P for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has preferred this application for

                   grant of regular bail in connection with Mashrakh Excise P.S.

                   Case No. 127 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable

                   under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, total 50 litres of illicit

                   country       made         liquor    was       recovered       from       Bamboo

                   Clamp(Baswari), where the petitioner was arrested.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted

                   that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in

                   this case. It has further been submitted that the petitioner is a

                   lady and she has no concern with the alleged recovery. It is next

                   submitted that nothing has been recovered from the conscious
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18849 of 2026(2) dt.25-03-2026
                                                          2/2




                        possession of the petitioner rather the recovery has been made

                        from an open place which is accessible to anyone. It is also

                        submitted that the procedure prescribed under Section 103 of

                        the B.N.S.S. has not been followed. It is lastly submitted that the

                        petitioner has clean criminal antecedent and is in custody since

                        22.11.2025.

                                     5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed

                        the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

                                     6. Considering the aforesaid submissions of the

                        parties and taking into account the facts and circumstance of the

                        case, let the petitioner above-named, be enlarged on bail on

                        furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand)

                        with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

                        learned Court concerned, Saran at Chapra, in connection with

                        Mashrakh Excise P.S. Case No. 127 of 2025.

                                     7. The application stands allowed.



                                                   (Praveen Kumar, J)
Jyoti/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.