Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Vikram KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted regular bail to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Vikram Kumar, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 8(c) and 20(b) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, alleging that he was a gratuitous passenger in a seized vehicle and that no contraband was found on his person. The police had intercepted an Alto car and recovered 23.1 grams of brown sugar from co‑accused Niraj Kumar Chaudhary and 6.33 grams from Kanhaiya Kumar, along with a mobile phone from the petitioner. The petitioner claimed innocence, no procedural compliance under Section 50 of the NDPS Act, and highlighted his lack of criminal antecedent and custody since 18‑01‑2026. The State opposed bail. Considering the facts, the court found no material reason to deny bail and ordered the petitioner to be released on a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties. The application for bail was allowed.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail should be granted to the petitioner under the NDPS Act given the circumstances of the seizure and his alleged role as a gratuitous passenger.
  • Whether the procedural requirements of Section 50 of the NDPS Act were complied with in the petitioner’s arrest.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • NDPS Act
  • Section 8
  • Section 20
  • Section 50
  • regular bail
  • gratuitous passenger
  • criminal antecedent

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18882 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-10 Year-2026 Thana- Champanagar District- Purnia
                 ======================================================
                 Vikram Kumar Son of Krishna Mohan Chaudhary @ Krishn Mohan
                 Chaudhari Resident of Village- Masuriya ward no. 12, P.S.- Sarsi, District-
                 Purnea

                                                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Avnish Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Nirmala Kumari, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   25-03-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has preferred this application for

                   grant of regular bail in connection with Champanagar P.S. Case

                   No. 10 of 2026 dated 17.01.2026 registered for the offences

                   punishable under Sections 8(c) and 20(b) of the Narcotic Drugs

                   and Psychotropic Substances Act.

                                3. As per the allegation, an Alto car was intercepted

                   and four persons were apprehended including the petitioner and

                   from the possession of co-accused Niraj Kumar Chaudhary 23.1

                   grams smack/brown sugar was recovered and from the

                   possession of Kanhaiya Kumar 6.33 grams of smack/brown

                   sugar was recovered and it is alleged that from the petitioner one
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18882 of 2026(2) dt.25-03-2026
                                                       2/2




                     mobile phone was recovered.

                                  4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                     petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this

                     case. It has been further submitted that no contraband article has

                     been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Moreover,

                     no procedure, as prescribed under Section 50 of N.D.P.S, has

                     been followed and petitioner happens to be a gratuitous

                     passenger. It is further submitted that petitioner is in custody

                     since 18.01.2026 and having no criminal antecedent.

                                  5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed

                     the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

                                  6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case

                     as well as period of custody, the petitioner above-named, is

                     directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of

                     Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like

                     amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned,

                     Purnea in connection with Champanagar P.S. Case No. 10 of

                     2026.

                                  7. The application stands allowed.



                                                (Praveen Kumar, J)
shivam/-
U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.