Patna High Court
Kundan KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
- Bench
- SANDEEP KUMAR
Holding
The application for regular bail was dismissed.
Summary
The petitioner, Kundan Kumar, applied for regular bail in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding before the Patna High Court. He is charged under Sections 304B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for the alleged killing of the deceased, a case registered as Madhepura P.S. Case No. 631 of 2024. The petitioner has been in custody since 19 July 2024, and the Sessions Trial in which he was an accused has apparently concluded with a judgment pronounced. The High Court examined the bail application in light of the seriousness of the offence and the fact that the trial had already been completed. The Court dismissed the bail application, refusing regular bail to the petitioner.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate legal standard for granting regular bail to an accused under Sections 304B and 34 of the IPC after the trial has concluded?
Legislation cited
- Indian Penal Code — s. 304B, 34
Subjects
- regular bail
- dowry death
- IPC 304B
- IPC 34
- criminal procedure
- high court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19034 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-631 Year-2024 Thana- MADHEPURA District- Madhepura
======================================================
Kundan Kumar Son of Suren Mallik @ Suren Malik Resident of Village -
Ramnagar, P.S. - Ghailardh, District - Madhepura
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amarnath Jha
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nagendra Prasad
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
5 24-03-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with
Madhepura P.S. Case No. 631 of 2024 registered for the offence
under Sections 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is
accused of killing the deceased. Petitioner is in custody since
19.07.2024.
4. The Sessions Trial in which the petitioner is an
accused appears to have concluded, and the judgment may have
been pronounced, as is evident from the impugned report sent
by the court below.
5. In these circumstances, this application is
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19034 of 2025(5) dt.24-03-2026
2/2
dismissed.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
Shishir/-
U T
Checking your session…