Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Naresh Kumar @ Naresh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The petitioner is entitled to bail as his alleged involvement is limited to ownership of the motorcycle and no direct participation in the offence.

Summary

The petitioner, Naresh Kumar, was implicated in a robbery case (PS Case No 403/2024) on the basis that his motorcycle was used by co‑accused Rakesh Kumar during the alleged offence. The co‑accused was apprehended by villagers who also produced a country‑made pistol and live cartridges, indicating a private‑person arrest. The petitioner argued that he merely owned the motorcycle, which had been lent to Rakesh Kumar for a personal errand, and that he had a clean antecedent. The State opposed bail, contending the seriousness of the offences under Sections 309(5) BNS and 25(1‑B), 26, 35 of the Arms Act. The Court examined the prima‑facie evidence and noted that the petitioner’s alleged involvement was limited to ownership of the vehicle, with no direct participation in the crime. Accordingly, the Court exercised its inherent power under Section 482(2) of the BNSS and ordered the petitioner’s release on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties. The order is subject to the usual conditions of bail and the pending trial in the lower court.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail when the only alleged link to the offence is ownership of the vehicle used in the crime
  • Whether the Court can exercise its inherent powers under Section 482(2) of the BNSS to grant bail in a case involving offences under the Arms Act

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • Arms Act
  • private‑person arrest
  • ownership of vehicle
  • Section 482(2) inherent powers
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19150 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-403 Year-2024 Thana- CHHATAPUR District- Supaul
                 ======================================================
                 Naresh Kumar @ Naresh Yadav Son of Late Saburi Yadav Resident of
                 Raghuniya, Ward No.- 7, P.S.- Kumarkhand, District – Madhepura.
                                                                             ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                  Versus
                  The State of Bihar.
                                                                      ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Dinesh Prasad Verma, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr.Mritunjay Kumar Nirala, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER
2   31-03-2026                    Heard the parties.

                                2. The accused/petitioner apprehending his

                   arrest in connection with Chatapur P.S. Case No. 403

                   of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under

                   Sections 309(5) BNS and 25(1-B) a/26/35 of Arms Act.

                                3. It is alleged that petitioner alongwith other

                   co-accused persons made an attempt to commit

                   robbery upon the informant when during the course of

                   occurrence, with the help of co-villagers, one of the co-

                   accused was apprehended, whereas the rest of two

                   accused persons fled away. Petitioner implicated with

                   this case for the reason that motorcycle of petitioner

                   bearing registration no. BR-50L-7371 was used with

                   crime in question.

                                4.    It      is   submitted       by     learned        counsel

                   appearing on behalf of the petitioner that during the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19150 of 2026(2) dt.31-03-2026
                                            2/3




          occurrence, co-accused namely Rakesh Kumar was

          apprehended by co-villager and a country made pistol

          and two live cartridges were also produced by the

          informant and others before the police. It is a case of

          arrest by private persons. It is submitted that merely

          being owner of motorcycle as mentioned aforesaid,

          which was given to Rakesh Kumar who is cousin son-in-

          law of the petitioner, the petitioner was implicated. It

          was given on pretext of taking medicine for her ailing

          mother. Petitioner claimed clean antecedent.

                       5. Learned APP opposed the prayer of bail.

                       6. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and

          by taking note of fact as prima facie a country made

          pistol and live cartridges appears to be produced by

          private persons, where implication of this petitioner

          appears only being registered owner of the motorcycle

          as alleged to be involved with crime in question,

          accordingly, above named petitioner, in the event of

          his arrest or surrender before the learned trial Court,

          within a period of four weeks of the order, is directed

          to be released on bail furnishing bail bond of Rs.

          10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of

          the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

          Chief     Judicial      Magistrate,        Supaul/concerned   Court,
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19150 of 2026(2) dt.31-03-2026
                                                          3/3




                        where the case is pending in connection with Chatapur

                        P.S. Case No. 403 of 2024 subject to the conditions as

                        laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.



                                              (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)
veena/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.