Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Guddu Kumar Yadav @ Guddu YadavversusThe State Of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioner subject to conditions.

Summary

Guddu Kumar Yadav was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor, with 909 litres seized, under Sections 274/275, 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances (BN.S.) Act, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022. The petitioner contended that the liquor was recovered from the garden of co‑accused Shambhu Kumar, that his name was mentioned only on the co‑accused’s disclosure, and that he was not present at the site nor in conscious possession of the liquor, asserting a clean antecedent. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed anticipatory bail. The Court, noting the lack of direct possession and the petitioner’s clean record, directed that he be released on anticipatory bail upon surrender within four weeks, subject to a bail bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties and conditions under Section 438(2) of the CrPC and Section 482(2) of the BN.S. Act.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under the circumstances of the alleged offence
  • Whether the petitioner’s alleged involvement, based solely on co‑accused’s disclosure, suffices for arrest
  • Whether the seizure of illicit liquor constitutes sufficient evidence of the petitioner’s conscious possession

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • illicit liquor
  • excise law
  • conscious possession
  • clean antecedent
  • CrPC Section 438
  • BN.S. Act

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                             CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19154 of 2026
                 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-190 Year-2025 Thana- GHOGHARDIHA District- Madhubani
                 ======================================================
                 Guddu Kumar Yadav @ Guddu Yadav S/O Raghunath Prasad Yadav @
                 Raghunath Yadav R/V- Gidaha, P.S- Ghoghardiha, District - Madhubani

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner
                                                     Versus
                 The State Of Bihar

                                                          ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner     :       Mr. Jitendra Kumar Bharti, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party :       Mr. Nawin Kumar Pandey, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   06-07-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                               2. The accused/petitioner is named in the FIR and

                   apprehending his arrest in connection with Ghoghardiha P.S.

                   Case No.190 of 2025 registered under Sections 274/275,

                   3(5) of B.N.S. (in short ‘B.N.S.’, 2023) and 30(a) of Bihar

                   Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022.

                               3. Allegation against the petitioner is to engage in

                   illegal trade/manufacturing of illicit liquor, where there is

                   recovery of 909 litres of IMFL/country-made liquor.

                               4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for

                   the petitioner that the recovery of alleged illicit liquor was
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19154 of 2026(2) dt.06-07-2026
                                            2/3




          made from the garden behind the house of co-accused,

          namely, Shambhu Kumar. It is also submitted that the name

          of petitioner arrayed solely on the disclosure made by the

          said co-accused. It is also argued by petitioner that neither

          the petitioner was present at the spot nor is he in any way

          connected with the said illicit liquor and it can be safely said

          that recovery of illicit liquor was not made from conscious

          possession of this petitioner. It is also submitted that the

          seizure list also appears doubtful being not supported by

          independent witnesses rather than by police personnel.

          Petitioner claimed clean antecedent.

                       5. Learned APP opposed the prayer of anticipatory

          bail to the petitioner.

                       6. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by

          taking note of the fact as recovery of illicit liquor prima facie

          not appears to be made from physical possession of this

          petitioner, who is a man of clean antecedent, accordingly,

          the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or

          surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks

          from today, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19154 of 2026(2) dt.06-07-2026
                                                        3/3




                      bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two

                      sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the

                      learned Special Judge, Excise Act, Jhanjharpur, Madhubani in

                      connection with Ghoghardiha P.S. Case No.190 of 2025,

                      subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2)

                      of the CrPC/under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.


                                                        (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)

Aniket/-
U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.