Patna High Court
Sushil kumar @ Sushil Kumar MahtoversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- WITHDRAWN
- Bench
- RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
Holding
The Court granted permission to withdraw the application, dismissing it as withdrawn.
Summary
The petitioner, Sushil Kumar Mahto, filed an application seeking permission to withdraw the same and to file a fresh application before the lower court, as the impugned order was already challenged in another proceeding. The learned counsel for the State opposed the request. The Court, after hearing both sides, granted permission to withdraw the application and allowed the petitioner liberty to move a fresh application. Consequently, the application was dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the original dispute were addressed.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the pending application and file a fresh one before the lower court
Subjects
- withdrawal of application
- procedural order
- criminal miscellaneous
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1931 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-64 Year-2024 Thana- AMNAUR District- Saran
======================================================
Sushil kumar @ Sushil Kumar Mahto Son of Manohar Mahto R/o Village -
Husepur, P.S. and P.O. - Amnour, Dist. - Saran at Chapra.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Praveen Ranjan, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Naresh Ray, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 20-01-2026 Heard Mr. Praveen Ranjan, learned counsel for the
petitioner and Mr. Ram Naresh Ray, learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. After some argument, learned counsel for the
petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with
liberty to move a fresh application before the learned Court
below as the impugned order has already been assailed in Cr.
Misc. No. 23037 of 2025.
3. Permission is accorded.
4. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed as
withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Suruchi/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.