Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Santosh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail was granted to the petitioner.

Summary

Santosh Kumar, the registered owner of a tanker, was implicated in a case alleging illegal manufacturing and trading of illicit liquor, with 3,707.4 litres of liquor recovered from the tanker. The petitioner argued that he had no physical possession of the liquor and was merely the owner of the vehicle. The prosecution highlighted his prior involvement in four criminal cases, all of which were on bail. The court examined whether the recovery was made from the petitioner’s conscious possession and considered the relevance of his antecedents. Concluding that the liquor was not recovered from his direct possession, the court granted bail, subject to a bond of Rs.10,000 and two sureties, invoking Section 482(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act. The bail order was conditioned on compliance with the requirements of the Exclusive Special Judge Excise, Purnia.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail can be granted when the accused is the owner of a vehicle used in the transport of illicit liquor but lacks conscious physical possession of the contraband.
  • Whether the petitioner’s prior criminal antecedents preclude the grant of bail.
  • Whether Section 482(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act permits bail in the present circumstances.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • illicit liquor
  • excise
  • criminal antecedent
  • Section 482
  • possession
  • tanker
  • Bihar

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19456 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-22 Year-2025 Thana- DAGARUA District- Purnia
                 ======================================================
                 Santosh Kumar Son of Vijay Paswan @ Vinay Paswan Resident of Village -
                 Suhai, P.S. - Vaishali, Dist. - Vaishali.              ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar.                           ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Anish Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Navin Kumar Pandey, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   31-03-2026                  Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on

                   behalf of the State.

                                2. The accused/petitioner apprehending his arrest in

                   connection with Dagarua P.S. Case No. 22 of 2025, registered

                   for the offences punishable under Sections 274, 275, 318(4),

                   338, 336(3), 340(2), 3(5) of BNS and Section 30(a) of the

                   Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

                                3. The allegation against the petitioner is to be

                   engaged in illegal trading/manufacturing of illicit liquor, where,

                   there is recovery of 3707.400 litres of IMFL/country made liquor

                   from the Tanker.

                                4. It is submitted by learned counsel that petitioner

                   implicated with present case only being registered owner of

                   Tanker which was found involved in carrying consignment of illicit
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19456 of 2026(2) dt.31-03-2026
                                                          2/2




                        liquor as alleged. It is submitted that admittedly no recovery was

                        made from the physical possession of the petitioner.

                                     5. Explaining criminal antecedent, petitioner found

                        involved in four criminal cases, where he is on bail in all cases.

                                     6. Learned APP opposed the prayer of bail.

                                     7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

                        as recovery of illicit liquor prima facie not appears to be made

                        from the conscious physical possession of this petitioner,

                        accordingly, above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest or

                        surrender before the learned trial Court, within a period of four

                        weeks of the order, is directed to be released on bail furnishing

                        bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two

                        sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

                        Exclusive Special Judge Excise, Court No. 01, Purnia/concerned

                        Court, where the case is pending in connection with Dagarua P.S.

                        Case No. 22 of 2025,, subject to the conditions as laid down

                        under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.



                                              (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)
veena/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.