Patna High Court
Pradeep SinghversusThe State Of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
Holding
The court held that bail may be granted in the present case subject to strict conditions despite the serious nature of the charges.
Summary
Petitioner Pradeep Singh, arrested on 17‑12‑2025 in connection with a case involving alleged firing on the informant's brother, sought bail. He faces charges under multiple sections of the Bihar National Security Act, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the injury report showed no firearm injury and that the petitioner was falsely implicated, while the State opposed bail citing the seriousness of the allegations and a pending case. The court, after considering the facts, granted bail on a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, imposing conditions of cooperation, presence in court, non‑tampering with evidence, and verification of criminal antecedents. The bail order was directed to be implemented by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar.
Issues considered
- Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner despite charges under the B.N.S. Act and Arms Act
- Whether the absence of firearm injury evidence warrants bail
- Whether the existence of another pending case affects the bail decision
Legislation cited
- Arms Act — s. 27
- Bihar National Security Act, 2023 — s. 109, 115(2), 118(1), 125, 126(2), 190, 191(2), 191(3), 351(2), 351(3), 352
Subjects
- bail
- criminal procedure
- Bihar National Security Act
- Arms Act
- firearm allegation
- injury report
- surety
- court conditions
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19509 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-4 Year-2024 Thana- Chakki District- Buxar
======================================================
Pradeep Singh S/O Lalan Singh Resident Of Village And Ps- Chakki, (Chunni
Dera), Dist.- Buxar
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shantanu Kumar, Advocate
For the Informant : Mr. Parijat Saurav, Advocate
For the State : Mrs. Sharda Kumari, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 31-03-2026 Heard Mr. Shantanu Kumar, learned counsel for the
petitioner, Mr. Parijat Saurav, learned counsel for the Informant
and Mrs. Sharda Kumari, learned APP for the State.
2. Petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since
17.12.2025, in connection with Chakki P.S. Case No. 04 of
2024, F.I.R. dated 26.08.2024 registered for the offences
punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 109, 115(2),
118(1), 125, 126(2), 352, 351(2) and (3) of the B.N.S., 2023 and
Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. Allegation against the petitioner is of firing on the
brother of the informant, namely, Arjun Singh.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19509 of 2026(2) dt.31-03-2026
2/3
present case. He further submits that it appears from the F.I.R.
that due to previous dispute, the present occurrence had taken
place and there is case and counter case between the parties.
Although there is specific allegation of firing attributed against
the petitioner by means of firearm to one Arjun Singh but from
perusal of the injury report of Arjun Singh it appears that no
firearm injury was found on the person of Arjun Singh. He
further submits that the police after investigation submitted
chargesheet against the petitioner and the petitioner is in custody
since 17.12.2025.
5. Learned counsel for the Informant as well as
learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, on the other
hand, has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the
petitioner and submits that there is direct and specific allegation
against the petitioner in the present F.I.R. and apart from that the
petitioner carries one more case other than the present one but
fairly submits on the basis of paragraph-3 of the bail petition
that the petitioner is on bail in the pending matter.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the
case, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on
furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand)
with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19509 of 2026(2) dt.31-03-2026
3/3
learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar in connection with
Chakki P.S. Case No. 04 of 2024, subject to the following
conditions :-
(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be
properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court
and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and
on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient
reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.
(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the
witness, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move
for cancellation of bail.
(3) And, further condition that the court below shall
verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at
any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his
criminal antecedents, the court below shall take step for
cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the
acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order
shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of
verification.
Ibrar//- (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.