Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Umesh Sahani @ Umesh Kumar @ Umesh SahniversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail is granted to the petitioner subject to a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and specified conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Umesh Sahani, was arrested on 16 February 2026 for alleged contravention of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 after 260 litres of country-made wine were seized near his village. He contended that the FIR was forged, he has a clean antecedent, and that mandatory provisions of Sections 103 and 105 of the BNSS, 2023 were not complied with. The State opposed bail, arguing the seriousness of the offence. The Court examined the facts, the alleged procedural lapses, and the petitioner’s claim of innocence, and decided to grant bail on the condition of a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties and several compliance conditions. The order also directed the petitioner to cooperate with the trial and warned of bail cancellation for non‑appearance, tampering with evidence, or concealment of antecedents.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriateness of granting bail to an accused under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 considering the nature of the offence and alleged procedural violations?

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • prohibition law
  • excise
  • illegal liquor
  • Section 30(a)
  • procedural lapse
  • criminal antecedent

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19544 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-45 Year-2026 Thana- BAHADURPUR District- Patna
                 ======================================================
                 Umesh Sahani @ Umesh Kumar @ Umesh Sahni Son of Late Bijli Sahani
                 Resident of village- Sandalpur, Pachiyor, PS -Bahadurpur, Dist -Patna

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                          ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Mithilesh Kr. Arya, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Sanjay Kumar, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   31-03-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                               2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since

                   16.02.2026 in connection with Bahadurpur P.S. Case No. 45 of

                   2026 for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of Bihar

                   Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

                               3. The prosecution story, in brief, is that on 08.02.2026

                   the informant has received a secret information at about 10:00

                   Hrs and he reached near Sandalpur Pachiyor Pond and saw that

                   one person fled away after seeing the police party and total 260

                   litres of country made wine have been recovered from the place

                   of occurrence. On enquiry, it was known that recovered wine

                   belongs to Umesh Sahani.

                               4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19544 of 2026(2) dt.31-03-2026
                                            2/3




          petitioner has clean antecedent and is innocent and he has

          falsely been implicated in the present case. It is further

          submitted that the allegation as alleged in the FIR is forged and

          fabricated and the petitioner has not committed any offence as

          alleged in the FIR. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits

          that petitioner has been made an accused in this case on the

          basis of suspicion and based on the disclosure made by local

          people. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

          petitioner has no concern with the alleged liquor and petitioner

          is in custody since 16.02.2026. It is next submitted that there is

          non-compliance of mandatory provisions of Sections 103 and

          105 of BNSS, 2023.

                      5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the

          State, on the other hand, has vehemently opposed the prayer for

          bail of the petitioner.

                       6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances,

          let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing

          bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of

          the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Exclusive

          Special Court of Excise, Patna City, District-Patna in connection

          with     Bahadurpur P.S. Case No. 45 of 2026, subject to the

          following conditions:-
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19544 of 2026(2) dt.31-03-2026
                                                       3/3




                                  i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be

                     properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court

                     and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and

                     on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient

                     reason, his bail bond shall be canceled by the Court below.

                                  ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the

                     witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to

                     move for cancellation of bail.

                                  iii. And further condition that the court below shall

                     verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at

                     any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his

                     criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for

                     cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the

                     acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order

                     shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of

                     verification.



                                            (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Gaurav Sinha/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.