Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Amod PandeyversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court granted permission to withdraw the application and dismissed the case as withdrawn.

Summary

Amod Pandey filed an application in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding before the Patna High Court. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. Pramod Kumar Singh, later sought the court’s permission to withdraw the application. The State, represented by A.P.P. Mr. Ram Sevak Choudhary, opposed the withdrawal. The court considered whether the petitioner could be allowed to withdraw the pending application. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma granted the petitioner's request, permitting the withdrawal. Consequently, the case was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the pending criminal miscellaneous application.

Subjects

  • withdrawal of application
  • criminal miscellaneous proceedings
  • procedural law
  • court permission

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19556 of 2026
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-95 Year-2025 Thana- Hattha District- Muzaffarpur
                  ======================================================
                  Amod Pandey Son of Late Maheshwar Pandey Resident of Village -
                  Sakhaura, Ward no. 12, Police Station - Hattha, District - Muzaffarpur.

                                                                                        ... ... Petitioner
                                                          Versus
            1.    The State of Bihar
            2.    Naresh Ray Son of Late Phakira Ray Resident of Village - Sakhaura, Ward
                  no. 12, Police Station - Hattha, District - Muzaffarpur.

                                                          ... ... Opposite Parties
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Pramod Kumar Singh, Advocate
                  For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Ram Sevak Choudhary, A.P.P.
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    31-03-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                    A.P.P. for the State.

                                 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing for

                    some time, seeks permission to withdraw the present

                    application.

                                 3. Permission, as prayed for, is granted.

                                 4. The case is dismissed as withdrawn.



                                           (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Gaurav Sinha/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.