Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Naresh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that, in view of the absence of incriminating material against the petitioner and the non‑compliance of Section 50 NDPS Act, regular bail should be granted.

Summary

The petitioner, Naresh Kumar, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 21(c), 23(c) and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, alleging that the only incriminating material was recovered from co‑accused Suraj Kumar, who claimed the petitioner supplied the drugs. The petitioner was not arrested at the scene, no contraband was found in his possession except a mobile phone, and the prosecution had not complied with Section 50 of the NDPS Act concerning the co‑accused. He had been in custody since 31‑12‑2025 and had no prior criminal record. The State opposed bail, but the court, considering the lack of material against the petitioner and procedural lapses, ordered his release on regular bail with a bond of Rs.10,000 and two sureties. The application for bail was allowed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail under the NDPS Act despite the allegations of supplying narcotics.
  • Whether the failure to comply with Section 50 of the NDPS Act regarding the co‑accused precludes granting bail.
  • Whether the duration of custody and the petitioner’s clean antecedent justify the grant of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • NDPS Act
  • regular bail
  • Section 21(c)
  • Section 23(c)
  • Section 29
  • Section 50
  • co‑accused
  • custody

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19567 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-168 Year-2025 Thana- Haraiya District- East Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Naresh Kumar Son of Gopal sah Resident Of Village- Tumariya Tola Ward
                 No-3, P.s- Haraiya, District- East Champaran

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Adarsh Ranjan, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Ahmad Ali, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   25-03-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                 2. The petitioner has preferred this application for

                   grant of regular bail in connection with Haraiya P.S. Case No.

                   168 of 2025 dated 30.12.2025 registered for the offences

                   punishable under Sections 21(c), 23(c) and 29 of the N.D.P.S.

                   Act.

                                 3. As per the allegation, 228 pieces of capsul of

                   Proximo-Spas and other tablets in several numbers has been

                   recovered from co-accused Suraj Kumar. The allegation against

                   the petitioner is that the said Suraj Kumar stated that he used to

                   purchase those articles at earlier point of time from the

                   petitioner.

                                 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19567 of 2026(2) dt.25-03-2026
                                                       2/2




                     petitioner was not arrested at the spot and nothing has been

                     recovered from his conscious possession. Moreover, on the

                     statement of co-accused Suraj Kumar, petitioner was arrested

                     and also no incriminating article has been recovered from him

                     except one mobile which he claims that it was his own and no

                     compliance of Section 50 of the N.D.P.S. Act with respect to co-

                     accused has been followed. It is further submitted that the

                     petitioner is in custody since 31.12.2025 having no criminal

                     antecedent.

                                  5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently

                     opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

                                  6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case

                     as well as period of custody, the petitioner above-named is

                     directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of

                     Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like

                     amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, East

                     Champaran at Motihari in connection with Haraiya P.S. Case

                     No. 168 of 2025.

                                  7. The application stands allowed.



                                                (Praveen Kumar, J)
shivam/-
U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.