Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Bittu Kumar SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The Court granted regular bail to the petitioners.

Summary

The petitioners, Bittu Kumar Sharma and Shivdhyan Sharma, were arrested in connection with the seizure of 410 grams of ganja, a loaded pistol, and 900 ml of foreign liquor, and charged under the NDPS Act, Arms Act, and Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. They contended that the seized items were not in their conscious possession and that the seizure list was not prepared in compliance with Section 105 of the BNSS, while also noting that they had been in judicial custody since 31‑12‑2025. The State opposed bail, citing the petitioners' prior criminal antecedents. After hearing both sides, the Court found merit in the petitioners' arguments and ordered their release on regular bail, subject to a bond of Rs.10,000 each with two sureties, to be satisfied before the Exclusive Special Judge of the Excise Court‑I, Bettiah. The order effectively grants bail despite the serious nature of the offences.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail can be granted to the accused in a case involving NDPS, Arms, and Prohibition offences.
  • Whether the seizure of the contraband was lawful given alleged non‑compliance with Section 105 of the BNSS.
  • Whether the petitioners' prior criminal antecedents preclude the grant of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • NDPS Act
  • Arms Act
  • seizure
  • criminal antecedent
  • judicial custody
  • Section 105
  • BNSS
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19724 of 2026
                 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-157 Year-2025 Thana- Banuchhapar District- West Champaran
                 ======================================================
           1.     Bittu Kumar Sharma S/o- Shivdhyan Sharma Resident of Vill- Banu
                  Chhapar, Badhai Tola, P.S.-Banu Chhapar, Dist- West Champaran
           2.    Shivdhyan Sharma S/o- Late Kailash Sharma Resident of Vill- Banu
                 Chhapar, Badhai Tola, P.S.-Banu Chhapar, Dist- West Champaran

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Sitesh Kashyap, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Dilip Kumar No. 1, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   25-03-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioners have prayed for regular bail in a

                   case registered for the offence punishable under sections 8/20(b)

                   (ii)(A) of NDPS Act, Sections 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms

                   Act and Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

                                3. The case of the prosecution is that mud grain house

                   of the petitioners, altogether 410 grams of ganja, one country

                   made loaded pistol and 900 ml of country made foreign liquor

                   were recovered.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

                   petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence.
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19724 of 2026(2) dt.25-03-2026
                                                        2/2




                      Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted nothing has

                      been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners.

                      There is no independent witness of the seizure list rather they

                      are police personnel. Police has not complied Section 105 of

                      BNSS while preparing the seizure list. Moreover, they are

                      languishing in judicial custody since 31.12.2025.

                                   5. Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed

                      the prayer of regular bail and has submitted that petitioner no. 1

                      is having criminal antecedent of two cases whereas petitioner

                      no. 2 is having criminal antecedent of one case.

                                   6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                      considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is

                      inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named

                      petitioners are directed to be released on bail in connection with

                      Banu Chhapar P.S. Case No. 157 of 2025 on furnishing bail

                      bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the

                      like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special

                      Judge, Excise Court-I, Bettiah, West Champaran.



                                            (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
shubham/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.