Patna High Court
Sanju Das @ Sanjay DasversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- WITHDRAWN
- Bench
- RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
Holding
The court granted permission to withdraw the application, dismissing it as withdrawn.
Summary
The petitioner, Sanju Das, filed an application seeking permission to withdraw the pending criminal miscellaneous application, citing that the impugned order had already been challenged in another proceeding (Cr. Misc. No. 18033 of 2025). The learned counsel for the petitioner requested liberty to file a fresh application before the lower court. The court, after hearing counsel for both sides, granted permission to withdraw the application. Consequently, the application was dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file a fresh petition. No substantive merits of the original dispute were addressed.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner may be granted permission to withdraw the pending application and file a fresh one before the lower court
Subjects
- withdrawal of application
- procedural permission
- criminal miscellaneous proceedings
- court order
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1988 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-330 Year-2024 Thana- NADI P.S. District- Patna
======================================================
Sanju Das @ Sanjay Das Son of Suraj Das Resident of village - Jethuli, P.S.-
Nadi, District - Patna
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Chandra Shekhar Sharma, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Upendra Kumar, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 20-01-2026 Heard Mr. Chandra Shekhar Sharma, learned counsel
for the petitioner and Mr. Upendra Kumar, learned Additional
Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission
to withdraw this application with liberty to file a fresh before
the learned court below as the impugned order has already been
assailed in Cr. Misc. No. 18033 of 2025.
3. Permission is accorded.
4. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed as
withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
atul/-
U T
Checking your session…