Dindayal ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2000 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-156 Year-2024 Thana- DEV District- Aurangabad
                 ======================================================
           1.     Dindayal Chaudhary S/o Ramashish Chaudhary R/o Village - Chandpur, P.S
                  - Deo, District - Aurangabad
           2.     Brajesh Kumar S/o Dindayal Chaudhary R/o Village - Chandpur, P.S - Deo,
                  District - Aurangabad
                                                                           ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                 Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                    ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Ravindra Kumar
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Ram Anurag Singh
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

6   07-07-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case

                   registered for the offence under Sections 190, 191(2), 191(3),

                   103(1) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the

                   Arms Act.

                                3. Informant alleged that on 22.07.2024, his son had

                   gone to Aurangabad court for affidavit and thereafter, on the

                   same date, he went with informant’s nephew for measurement

                   of a piece of land, where these petitioners along with other co-

                   accused persons were objecting for measurement of land and in

                   this way, co-accused Shivdhyan Chaudhary opened fire, which

                   hit son of informant and in course of treatment, son of informant

                   died.
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2000 of 2026(6) dt.07-07-2026
                                                       2/2




                                  4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

                     petitioners are innocent and committed no offence. As per F.I.R.

                     itself, it was co-accused Shivdhyan Chaudhary, who shot dead

                     son of informant. There is no allegation of overt act against

                     these petitioners. They are only alleged to be present at the place

                     of occurrence. Police, after investigation, submitted final form

                     against these petitioners.

                                  5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail

                     petition.

                                  6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances,

                     let the above named petitioners, in the event of their

                     arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be

                     enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten

                     thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the

                     satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad

                     (Bihar) in connection with Deo P.S. Case No. 156 of 2024,

                     subject to condition as laid down under Section 482 of the

                     Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.



                                                    (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
anay

U      T