Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Suganti DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail is granted to the petitioner subject to a Rs.10,000 bond, two sureties of equal amount, and monthly police‑station attendance.

Summary

Suganti Devi was arrested in connection with the possession of 8 liters and 400 ml of illicit liquor, alleged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. She had been in custody since 19 February 2026 and filed a bail application. The Patna High Court considered the quantum of the seizure and the nature of the offence. The Court allowed the bail application, directing her to furnish a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of the same amount and to appear at the police station on the first Sunday of each month. The order was limited to the bail matter and did not prejudice the merits of the trial.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act involving the seizure of 8.4 litres of illicit liquor.

Subjects

  • bail
  • prohibition law
  • illicit liquor
  • criminal procedure
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20025 of 2026
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-20 Year-2026 Thana- PANAPUR District- Saran
                 ======================================================
                 Suganti Devi Wife of Late Sanjay Nut Resident of Village- Bijaulia, P.S.-
                 Panapur, District- Saran

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Hemant Kumar
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Arun Kumar
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   01-04-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                   2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with

                   Panapur P.S. Case No. 20 of 2026 registered for the offence

                   under Sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

                                   3. As per the prosecution case, the recovery is of 8

                   liters and 400 ml of illicit liquor from the petitioner, who is a

                   female.

                                   4. The petitioner is in custody since 19.02.2026.

                                   5. Considering the quantum of recovery, this

                   application is allowed.

                                    6. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on

                   bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand)

                   with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20025 of 2026(2) dt.01-04-2026
                                                      2/2




                    the concerned Court below in connection with Panapur P.S.

                    Case No. 20 of 2026.

                                    7. As a condition of this order, the petitioner after

                    being released on bail is directed to mark his attendance at

                    Panapur Police Station on first Sunday of each month. Any

                    default in appearance at the police station will result in

                    cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioner.

                                     8. It is, however, clarified that the observations

                    made herein are limited to the adjudication of the present bail

                    application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner at

                    any subsequent stage of the trial and this Court has not

                    expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.



                                                               (Sandeep Kumar, J)
Vikas/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.