Patna High Court
Nagendra Kumar @ Nagendra MahtoversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
- Bench
- SANDEEP KUMAR
Holding
Bail was denied to the petitioner.
Summary
The petitioner, Nagendra Kumar, applied for bail in a criminal case (Sessions Trial No. 317 of 2025) arising from a charge under Section 309(4) of the BNS for looting a pick‑up van after tying the victim. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and co‑accused committed the robbery. The petitioner has been in custody since 22‑12‑2024 and faces 21 other serious cases. The court considered the gravity of the offence and the petitioner’s antecedents. Concluding that the seriousness warranted continued detention, the court refused bail. The order is limited to this bail application and does not prejudice the merits of the trial.
Issues considered
- Whether bail should be granted to the accused under Section 309(4) of the BNS considering the seriousness of the offence and the petitioner’s criminal antecedents
Legislation cited
- BNS — s. 309(4)
Subjects
- bail
- Section 309(4)
- BNS
- robbery
- criminal antecedents
- high court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20052 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-216 Year-2024 Thana- UJIYARPUR District- Samastipur
======================================================
Nagendra Kumar @ Nagendra Mahto S/O Ram Kishun Mahto R/O Village-
Daulatpur Chandi, P.S- Hajipur Sadar, District- Vaishali.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Dhirendra Prasad Sinha
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Manoj Kumar
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 01-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with
Sessions Trial No. 317 of 2025 arising out of Ujiyarpur P.S.
Case No. 216 of 2024 registered for the offence under Section
309(4) of the BNS.
3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and
others are said to have looted the pick-up van after tying the
victim.
4. The petitioner is in custody since 22.12.2024
and he is accused in 21 more cases of serious nature.
5. Considering the gravity of the offence and the
antecedents of the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant
bail to the petitioner.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20052 of 2026(2) dt.01-04-2026
2/2
6. Accordingly, this application is dismissed.
7. It is, however, clarified that the observations
made herein are limited to the adjudication of the present bail
application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner at
any subsequent stage of the trial and this Court has not
expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
Vikas/-
U
Checking your session…