Patna High Court
Amresh PaswanversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- SANDEEP KUMAR
Holding
Bail was granted to the petitioner subject to monetary, surety, charitable donation, attendance, and antecedent verification conditions.
Summary
Amresh Paswan was arrested in connection with the seizure of 240 litres of country-made liquor, alleged to be an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner claimed innocence, asserted that the vehicle did not belong to him, and highlighted his clean criminal record. He offered to donate Rs. 25,000 to a charitable organization without admitting guilt. The State opposed bail, but the court, after considering the circumstances, ordered his release on bail upon furnishing a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, depositing the charitable amount, and complying with attendance and antecedent verification conditions. The bail order was made subject to verification of his clean antecedent and compliance with the stipulated conditions.
Issues considered
- Whether bail should be granted to a person accused under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for possession of illicit liquor.
Subjects
- bail
- prohibition law
- excise
- illegal liquor
- criminal procedure
- surety
- charitable donation
- antecedent verification
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20138 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-15 Year-2026 Thana- PIPRA District- Patna
======================================================
Amresh Paswan S/O Mudrika Paswan Resident of village - Kanhiya Nagar ,
Behind Khoida Imli Mazar, P.s- Phulwari Sharif, Dist.- Patna
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rakesh Bihari Singh, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 01-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Pipra
P.S. Case No. 15/2026 dated 24.02.2026 for the offences
punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and
Excise Act.
3. The recovery is of 240 litres of country-made liquor
from the car.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner is innocent and he is in custody since 24.02.2026 and
has got no criminal antecedent. The car does not belong to the
petitioner.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner is ready to donate Rs. 25,000/- in some charitable
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20138 of 2026(2) dt.01-04-2026
2/3
organization without accepting his guilt.
6. Learned APP appearing for the State opposes the
prayer for bail of the petitioner.
7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case
and submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner, let the
petitioner, above named, be released on hail upon furnishing
bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the
like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Exclusive
Special Excise Judge-II, Patna in connection with Pipra P.S.
Case No. 15/2026.
This is also subject to the condition that the petitioner
shall deposit an amount of Rs. 25,000/- in Ramakrishna Mission
Ashrama, Ramakrishna Avenue, Patna, Bihar 800 004, and
produce the receipt of the same before the Court below. The bail
bonds of the petitioner shall be accepted after verifying the
genuineness of the receipt produced by the petitioner.
As a condition of this order, the petitioner after being
released on bail is directed to mark his attendance at
Phulwarisharif Police Station on first Sunday of each month.
Any default in appearance at the police station will result in
cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioner.
As the petitioner claims to have clean antecedent, the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20138 of 2026(2) dt.01-04-2026
3/3
Court below, before accepting the bail bonds of the petitioner is
directed to verify the antecedent of the petitioner. If the
petitioner is found to be involved in any other case then the bail
bonds of the petitioner shall not be accepted.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
atul/-
U T
Checking your session…