Patna High Court
Rambahadur Kamat @ Rambahadur KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
Holding
Anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioner subject to a bail bond and sureties.
Summary
The petitioner, Rambahadur Kamat, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 74 and 351(2) of the B.N.S., alleging he assaulted an informant with a Farsa. He contended he was falsely implicated and that the injuries caused were simple in nature. The State opposed the bail, arguing the seriousness of the offences. The Court, after considering the modest nature of the alleged injuries and the petitioner's claim of innocence, granted anticipatory bail. The order directed that if arrested within eight weeks, the petitioner be released on a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail should be granted in the present case
- Whether the allegations under the cited sections warrant denial of bail
- Whether conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. are applicable
Legislation cited
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- criminal law
- assault
- false implication
- Section 482
- Bihar
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2045 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-271 Year-2025 Thana- PIPRA District- Supaul
======================================================
Rambahadur Kamat @ Rambahadur Kumar son of Raghuwansh Kamat
Resident of village- Lalpur, Ward no. 05, Ps- Pipra Dist- Supaul
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Nafisu Zzoha, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
ORAL ORDER
2 31-01-2026 Heard Mr. Nafisu Zzoha, learned counsel appearing
on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, learned
APP appearing on behalf of the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case
registered for the offence punishable under Sections 191(2),
115(2), 118(1), 109, 74 and 351(2) of the B.N.S..
3. As per F.I.R., it is alleged that this petitioner
assaulted on the head of informant with Farsa.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on
behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has
committed no offence. Petitioner has falsely been implicated in
this case with ulterior motive. Doctor has found the injuries,
allegedly caused by this petitioner, simple in nature.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2045 of 2026(2) dt.31-01-2026
2/2
opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the
petitioner.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case
and nature of injuries allegedly caused by this petitioner, the
prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is allowed.
7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within
a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named
petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.
10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount
each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Supaul in connection
with Pipra P.S. Case No. 271 of 2025, subject to condition as
laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S..
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
shashank/-
U T
Checking your session…