Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Danish Raja @ Danish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The Court granted bail to the petitioner, finding that the circumstances did not justify continued detention.

Summary

The petitioner, Danish Raja, was charged under Sections 140(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. for allegedly kidnapping the son of an informant and demanding a ransom of Rs. 1,20,000. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, that no ransom was actually paid, and that he had no prior criminal record, having been in custody since 30‑12‑2025. The State opposed bail, relying on the victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the B.N.S.S. that identified the petitioner as a participant in the kidnapping. After hearing both sides, the Court considered the lack of any extortion payment, the petitioner’s clean antecedents, and the circumstances of the case. The Court concluded that the petitioner was entitled to bail and ordered his release on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties. The bail order was directed to be effected by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail despite the serious nature of the kidnapping and extortion allegations
  • Whether the victim’s statement under Section 183 of the B.N.S.S. suffices to deny bail

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • kidnapping
  • extortion
  • criminal procedure
  • surety
  • Section 183 statement
  • pre‑trial detention

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20523 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-302 Year-2025 Thana- THAWE District- Gopalganj
                 ======================================================
                 Danish Raja @ Danish Kumar, Son of Raj Husen @ Raja Hussain, Resident
                 of Village- Basdila Bujurg, P.S.- Tamkuhiraj, District- Kushinagar, Uttar
                 Pradesh

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Javed Aslam, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Rajesh Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   31-03-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with

                   Thawe P.S. Case No. 302 of 2025 registered for the offence

                   punishable under Sections 140(2) and 3(5) of B.N.S.

                                3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the son of

                   the informant was kidnapped by some unknown miscreants and a

                   call was made from the mobile of his son demanding Rs.

                   1,20,000/- as ransom.

                                4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner

                   has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no

                   offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned

                   counsel for the petitioner has submitted that after some time, the

                   petitioner was apprehended and the son of the informant also
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20523 of 2026(2) dt.31-03-2026
                                                         2/2




                       returned back. Actually, the son of the informant has demanded the

                       extortion money. It has further been submitted that save and except

                       the demand, nothing was paid towards that demand. It has also

                       been submitted that the boy has been recovered and there is no

                       payment of any extortion money. Petitioner is having no criminal

                       antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since

                       30.12.2025.

                                    5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently

                       opposed the application for bail and has submitted that the learned

                       trial Court has recorded that the victim Vinay Kumar has given his

                       statement under Section 183 of the B.N.S.S. wherein he has stated

                       that he was kidnapped by the petitioner and others.

                                    6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                       considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

                       inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named

                       petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond

                       of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the

                       like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M.,

                       Gopalganj in connection with Thawe P.S. Case No. 302 of 2025.


                                                         (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)

lata/-
U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.