Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Krishnandan Kumar @ KrishnandanversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The petitioners are entitled to bail in the present case.

Summary

The petitioners, Krishnandan Kumar and Arvind Kumar, applied for bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly carrying illicit liquor. The prosecution alleged that five persons were transporting 135 litres of illicit Nepali liquor, of which two were apprehended and three escaped. The petitioners contended they were innocent, no liquor was recovered from them, and the police failed to comply with Section 105 of the BNSS during seizure. The State opposed the bail. After hearing both sides, the Court found merit in the petitioners' arguments and ordered that they be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties each.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
  • Whether the seizure of alleged illicit liquor complied with Section 105 of the BNSS.
  • Whether the petitioners have sufficient grounds to claim innocence and lack of criminal antecedent.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • illicit liquor
  • prohibition law
  • seizure procedure
  • Section 105
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20609 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-11 Year-2026 Thana- KUNDWACHAINPUR District- East
                                                        Champaran
                 ======================================================
           1.     Krishnandan Kumar @ Krishnandan S/O Jyotik Mukhiya @ Jyoti Mukhiya
                  Resident of village- Bakhari (Khajuri Yadopur Bakhari), Police Station-
                  Dhaka, District- East Champaran.
           2.    Arvind Kumar S/O Sonalal Rai Resident of village- Bakhari (Khajuri
                 Yadopur Bakhari), Police Station- Dhaka, District- East Champaran.

                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Md. Shakir Ahmad, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   31-03-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the

                   learned APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioners have prayed for bail in connection

                   with Kundwa Chainpur P.S. Case No. 11 of 2026 registered for

                   the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar

                   Prohibition and Excise Act.

                                3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that five

                   persons were carrying illicit liquor on their head, two persons were

                   apprehended and three persons managed to escape. Altogether 135

                   liters of illicit country made nepali liquor was recovered.

                                4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioners has submitted that petitioners are innocent and have
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20609 of 2026(2) dt.31-03-2026
                                                       2/2




                     committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this

                     case. He also submits that nothing has been recovered from the

                     possession of the petitioners. The witnesses of the seizure list are

                     police personnel and the police has not complied with Section 105

                     of the BNSS while making the seizure. He further submits that a

                     statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioners

                     have no criminal antecedent and they are languishing in judicial

                     custody since 10.01.2026.

                                  5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP

                     for the State.

                                  6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                     considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

                     inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail.         The above named

                     petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail

                     bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) each with two

                     sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

                     Exclusive Special Excise Court No. 3, East Champaran, Motihari

                     in connection with Kundwa Chainpur P.S. Case No. 11 of 2026.



                                                    (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
Sudhanshu/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.