Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Md. Nakki KureshiversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The Court granted bail to the petitioner on the condition of a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties.

Summary

The petitioner, Md. Nakki Kureshi, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 118(2) and 109 of the B.N.S., alleging that he assaulted two persons, Md. Dablu and Md. Fizan, with a knife. The prosecution’s case rests on the FIR alleging a knife attack, while the petitioner’s counsel highlighted an injury report indicating injuries caused by a hard blunt object, creating a factual inconsistency. The petitioner asserted his innocence, claimed false implication, and pointed out his clean criminal record and that he had been in judicial custody since 24‑07‑2025. The State opposed bail, but the Court, after considering the discrepancy in the medical evidence and the petitioner’s lack of prior offences, decided to grant bail. The bail was conditioned on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of the same amount, subject to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge‑XIX, Bhagalpur.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail despite the serious nature of the alleged offences under the B.N.S.
  • Whether the injury report undermines the prosecution’s allegation of a knife assault
  • Whether the petitioner poses a flight risk or a risk of tampering with evidence

Legislation cited

  • B.N.S. — s. 109, 115(2), 118(2), 126(2)

Subjects

  • bail
  • assault
  • injury report
  • false implication
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20696 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-90 Year-2025 Thana- MOUZAHIDPUR District- Bhagalpur
                 ======================================================
                 Md. Nakki Kureshi, S/o Late Riazul Qureshi, R/o vill- Maulanachak, Miyan
                 Sahab Maidan, P.S.- Mojahidpur, Dist- Bhagalpur

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Vivekanand Vivek, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   01-04-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection

                   with Mojahidpur P.S. Case No.90 of 2025 registered for the

                   offence punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 118(2) and

                   109 of B.N.S.

                                3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the

                   petitioner has assaulted with knife to one Md. Dablu and Md.

                   Fizan.

                                4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has

                   committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this

                   case. From perusal of the injury report which is annexed at

                   Annexure-2 Series it will transpire that the doctor has opined
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20696 of 2026(2) dt.01-04-2026
                                                         2/2




                       that the nature of injury is simple probably due to hard blunt

                       object. It has further been submitted that from perusal of the

                       F.I.R. it is clear that there is allegation against the petitioner that

                       he has assaulted with knife whereas the injury report goes to

                       show that the injuries received by the injured is caused by hard

                       and blunt substance. The injuries do not correlate with the

                       allegation. Petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and he is

                       languishing in judicial custody since 24.07.2025.

                                    5. Learned APP appearing for the State has

                       vehemently opposed the application for bail.

                                    6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                       considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

                       inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named

                       petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail

                       bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties

                       of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

                       Additional Sessions Judge-XIX, Bhagalpur in connection with

                       Mojahidpur P.S. Case No.90 of 2025.


                                                         (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)

lata/-
U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.