Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Mantu Turha @ Mantu Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court grants anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to specified conditions.

Summary

Mantu Turha (also known as Mantu Kumar Sah), a rustic and illiterate resident of Gopalganj, filed a petition seeking anticipatory bail in connection with FIR No. 219 of 2019, which alleged his involvement in offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, including 147, 149, 307, and 504. The petitioner asserted that he had no criminal antecedent, was merely a passer‑by, and was unaware of any wrongdoing, contending that his name appeared in the FIR only because he was present at the scene. The State opposed the relief, pointing out that the petitioner’s name was recorded in the FIR. The Court, after considering the submissions, noted the absence of any direct allegation against the petitioner, his lack of prior record, and his undertaking to cooperate with the trial, and therefore granted anticipatory bail subject to stringent conditions, including a payment of Rs. 2,000 to the Chief Minister’s Relief Fund and a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties. The order also imposed conditions such as regular appearance before the trial court and police station, non‑interference with witnesses, and abstention from further offences.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriateness of granting anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC to a petitioner implicated in multiple serious IPC offences?
  • Whether the petitioner’s lack of prior criminal record and claim of being a mere passer‑by justify the grant of anticipatory bail despite the gravity of the alleged offences?

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Section 438 CrPC
  • Indian Penal Code
  • bail conditions
  • criminal procedure
  • rural petitioner
  • multiple offences

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20802 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-219 Year-2019 Thana- GOPALPUR District- Gopalganj
                 ======================================================
                 Mantu Turha @ Mantu Kumar Sah S/O Nathu Turha Resident of Village -
                 Binod Khreya, P.S- Gopalganj, District- Gopalganj

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :         Mr. Pankaj Kumar Dubey, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :         Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   08-04-2026                  Heard the parties.

                                2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in

                   connection with Gopalpur P.S. Case No. 219 of 2019 for the

                   offence under sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 307, 332, 336, 337,

                   353, 188, 435 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code lodged on

                   16.11.2019 by the informant, Deepchand Joshi.

                                3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged

                   that for the removal of encroachment, Administrative/Police

                   officials     reached      the     place   but     were     welcomed        with

                   abuse/bricks/stones. This led to the FIR.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he do

                   not have any criminal antecedent, is a rustic/illiterate person and

                   had no knowledge about his implication in the FIR. Being a

                   passer-by, he may be present there which led to his implication and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20802 of 2026(2) dt.08-04-2026
                                            2/3




          the investigation is still on. The last submission is that without

          accepting the allegation and/or the outcome of the present petition,

          learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he intends to

          contribute Rs. 2,000/- to the Chief Minister’s Relief Fund.

                       5. Learned APP opposes the prayer submitting that his

          name has cropped up and was there in the FIR.

                       6. Taking into account the submissions of the parties as

          also that no direct allegation is against him, have no criminal

          antecedent and an undertaking has been given that he shall be

          diligently appearing in trial, in that background, this Court is

          inclined to extend him the privilege of anticipatory bail with

          conditions subject to payment of Rs. 2,000/- to the Chief

          Minister’s Relief Fund through Demand Draft and the receipt be

          submitted to the learned trial Court.

                       7. Let the petitioner be released on bail in the event of

          arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from the receipt

          of this order, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten

          thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction

          of learned CJM, 1st Class, Gopalganj in connection with Gopalpur

          P.S. Case No. 219 of 2019 subject to the following conditions:

                       (i)   one    of    the     bailor   should   be   the   family

          member/relative of the petitioner who shall provide official

          document (Aadhaar Card/Voter ID Card/Pan Card/Driving
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20802 of 2026(2) dt.08-04-2026
                                                      3/3




                    License) to show his/her bona fide;

                                 (ii) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date

                    before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive

                    dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his bail

                    bond by the Trial Court itself;

                                 (iii) the petitioner shall appear before the concerned

                    police station every month for six months to mark his attendance

                    and after the end of the period, the certificate shall be submitted

                    before the Trial Court failing which steps shall be taken for the

                    cancellation of the bail bonds;

                                 (iv) the petitioner shall in no way try to induce or

                    promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences,

                    failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for

                    cancellation of the bail bonds;

                                 (v) the petitioner shall desist from committing any

                    criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty to

                    take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.

                                 (vi) the petitioner shall be appearing before the Police

                    Station as and when required for cooperating in the investigation;



                                                   (Rajiv Roy, J)
Adnan/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.