Patna High Court
Rajesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISS FOR NON-PROSECUTION
- Bench
- CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
Holding
The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution due to the petitioners' failure to appear.
Summary
Petitioners Rajesh Kumar and Kamlesh Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous petition (No.20832 of 2025) arising out of a complaint case (PS No.1938, 2021) in the Patna High Court. The petitioners failed to appear before the Court despite repeated notices. The Court observed that this was the second instance of non-appearance, indicating a loss of interest in prosecuting the petition. Consequently, the Court held that the petition could not proceed without the petitioners' participation. The petition was therefore dismissed for want of prosecution.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate consequence when petitioners repeatedly fail to appear before the Court in a criminal miscellaneous petition?
Subjects
- want of prosecution
- criminal miscellaneous petition
- non-appearance
- procedural default
- petition dismissed
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20832 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1938 Year-2021 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE District-
Patna
======================================================
1. Rajesh Kumar S/o- Late Kamdeo Prasad R/o- Jojobeda Camp Telco PO-
Rahargoda PS-Chhota Govindpur Distt- East Singhbhum, Jharkhand
2. Kamlesh Kumar S/o- Late Kamdeo Prasad R/o- Jojobeda Camp Telco PO-
Rahargoda PS-Chhota Govindpur Distt- East Singhbhum, Jharkhand
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Pawan Prasad S/o- Late Madan Lal R/o- Bakarganj, Daldali Road Ps-
Kadamkuan Dist- Patna
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : None
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Kumar Ranjit Ranjan, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
ORAL ORDER
7 13-01-2026 This is the second occasion when none appeared on
behalf of petitioner on repeated calls. It appears that petitioner
lost interest in prosecution.
2. Considering aforesaid, present petition stands
dismissed in want of prosecution.
(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)
S.Tripathi/-
U T
Checking your session…