Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Bishudev Ram @ Vishudev RamversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail is granted to the petitioner subject to specified conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Bishudev Ram, was arrested on 31 January 2026 in connection with an excise case involving the seizure of 675 litres of illicit liquor from a tempo. He filed a bail petition, contending that no liquor was recovered from his conscious possession and that the investigation violated Sections 103 and 105 of the Bihar Narcotic/Excise (BNSS) Act, 2023. The prosecution opposed bail, pointing to the recovery from the tempo and the petitioner’s prior criminal antecedent. The court examined the procedural lapse and the lack of direct possession, and concluded that these factors warranted the grant of bail. Accordingly, the court ordered bail on a bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions of cooperation, appearance, non‑tampering with evidence, and verification of any concealed criminal antecedent.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted when the seized illicit liquor was not found in the petitioner’s conscious possession.
  • Whether non‑compliance with Sections 103/105 of the BNSS, 2023 justifies bail.
  • Whether the petitioner’s prior criminal antecedent precludes bail.

Subjects

  • bail
  • excise
  • illicit liquor
  • procedural non‑compliance
  • criminal antecedent
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • BNSS

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20920 of 2026
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-23 Year-2026 Thana- Excise Jhanjharpur District- Madhubani
                 ======================================================
                 Bishudev Ram @ Vishudev Ram Son of Sobhir Ram Resident of Village-
                 Phulkahi, Ward No. 14, P.S.- Phulparas, District- Madhubani
                                                                              ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                       ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Ms. Prerna, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Khurshid Anwar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   30-03-2026                    Heard Ms. Prerna, learned counsel for the petitioner

                   and Mr. Khurshid Anwar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor

                   for the State.

                               2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since

                   31.01.2026 in connection with G.O. No. 143 of 2026 arising out

                   of Excise Jhanjharpur P.S. Case No. 23 of 2026, F.I.R. dated

                   30.01.2026 for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a),

                   32(1) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise

                   (Amendment) Act, 2018.

                               3. Recovery is of 675 liters of illicit liquor.

                               4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the

                   present case. She further submits that it appears from the F.I.R.

                   as well as seizure list that nothing has been recovered from the

                   conscious possession of the petitioner rather the recovery of 675
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20920 of 2026(2) dt.30-03-2026
                                            2/3




          liters of illicit liquor has been made from the tempo in question.

          There is non-compliance of section 103/105 of the BNSS, 2023.

          She further submits that the seizure list witnesses were the

          police personnel. The petitioner is in custody since 31.01.2026.

                      5 The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has

          vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and

          submits that the recovery has been made from the tempo in

          question and apart from that the petitioner carries one criminal

          antecedent other than the present one.

                       6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

          that nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession

          of the petitioner and there is non-compliance of Section 103/105

          of the BNSS, 2023, let the petitioner, above named, be released

          on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand)

          with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

          the learned Special Judge (Excise), Jhanjharpur Madhubani in

          connection with G.O. No. 143 of 2026 arising out of Excise

          Jhanjharpur P.S. Case No. 23 of 2026, subject to the following

          conditions:-

                        i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be

           properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court

           and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20920 of 2026(2) dt.30-03-2026
                                                        3/3




                       on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient

                       reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

                                    ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the

                       witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to

                       move for cancellation of bail.

                                   iii. And further condition that the court below shall

                      verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at

                      any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his

                      criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for

                      cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the

                      acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order

                      shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of

                      verification.



                                             (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Vanisha/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.