Patna High Court
RakeshversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- ALLOWED
- Bench
- ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
Holding
The court granted bail to the petitioner, directing him to furnish a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties.
Summary
The petitioner, Rakesh, a driver, was arrested in connection with the seizure of 225 litres of illicit foreign liquor from a vehicle, charged under Sections 30(a), 32(i)(iii) and 41(i)(ii) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act. He contended that he had no knowledge of the liquor, that none was found in his personal possession, and that the police failed to comply with Section 105 of the BNSS while making the seizure. He also highlighted his clean criminal record and that he had been in judicial custody since 8 February 2026. The State opposed bail, but the court, after considering the facts and the alleged procedural irregularities, decided to grant bail. The petitioner was ordered to furnish a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of the same amount to the Exclusive Special Judge (Excise)-II, Kaimur.
Issues considered
- Whether bail should be granted to a driver accused of possession of illicit liquor when he claims lack of knowledge and procedural lapses in seizure.
- Whether the alleged non‑compliance with Section 105 of the BNSS by the police warrants bail.
Legislation cited
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act — s. 30(a), 32(i)(iii), 41(i)(ii)
- BNSS — s. 105
Subjects
- bail
- excise
- illicit liquor
- driver
- procedural lapse
- seizure
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
- criminal antecedent
- surety
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21106 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-68 Year-2026 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Kaimur (Bhabua)
======================================================
Rakesh S/O Sunera Resident of R/O Village- Gorar (52-R), P.S- Kharkhoda,
Distt.- Sonipat, Hariyana.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Aquaib Khan, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nityanand, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
ORAL ORDER
2 02-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection
with Bhabhua Excise P.S. Case No.68 of 2026 registered for the
offence punishable under Sections 30(a), 32(i)(iii) & 41(i)(ii) of
the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act.
3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that
altogether 225 liters of illicit foreign liquor was recovered from
a car.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is driver of the
vehicle. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted
that the petitioner was unaware of the alleged liquor in the
vehicle. It has further been submitted that nothing has been
recovered from the possession of this petitioner. Learned
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21106 of 2026(2) dt.02-04-2026
2/2
counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that the
witnesses of the seizure list are police personnel and police have
not complied Section 105 of the BNSS while making seizure.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that the
petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and he is in judicial
custody since 08.02.2026.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP
for the State.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and
considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is
inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named
petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail
bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties
of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the court of learned
Exclusive Special Judge (Excise)-II, Kaimur at Bhabhua in
connection with Bhabhua Excise P.S. Case No.68 of 2026.
(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
durgesh/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.