Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Subham KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner subject to a bond of Rs 10,000 and specified conditions.

Summary

Subham Kumar was arrested on 10 January 2026 in connection with an FIR dated 9 January 2026 under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 876 litres of foreign liquor. The majority of the liquor was recovered from the house and car of co‑accused Amit Thakur, who had already been granted bail. The petitioner argued that he has a clean antecedent, the FIR is fabricated, and his presence at the co‑accused’s premises should not make him liable. The State opposed bail. The court, noting the petitioner’s clean record and that the primary recovery was from the co‑accused, ordered his release on bail of Rs 10,000 with two sureties and imposed conditions regarding cooperation, non‑tampering with evidence, and verification of antecedents.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail despite the recovery of foreign liquor from the co‑accused’s premises.
  • Whether the petitioner’s presence at the co‑accused’s house makes him liable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

Subjects

  • bail
  • excise law
  • foreign liquor
  • Section 30(a)
  • criminal antecedent
  • co‑accused

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21115 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-20 Year-2026 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Darbhanga
                 ======================================================
                 Subham Kumar S/o- Dabbu Jaiswal @ Saket Jaiswal Resident of Mohalla-
                 Gullowara, P.S.- Town, Dist- Darbhanga

                                                                                      ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :         Mr.Saurav Anand, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :         Mr.Nityanand, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   31-03-2026                     Heard Mr.Saurav Anand, learned counsel for the

                   petitioner and Mr.Nityanand, learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since

                   10.01.2026 in connection with Excise P.S. (Sadar) Case No. 20

                   of 2026, F.I.R. dated 09.01.2026 registered for the offence

                   punishable under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise

                   Act.

                                3. Recovery is of 876 liters of foreign liquor.

                                4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner

                   submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent. The allegation

                   as alleged in the FIR is false and fabricated and the petitioner

                   has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR. Further

                   submits that it appears from the FIR that altogether 795.240

                   liters of foreign liquor was recovered from possession of co-
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21115 of 2026(2) dt.31-03-2026
                                            2/3




          accused person, namely, Amit Thakur and 80.760 liter of foreign

          liquor was recovered from the Car in question. Learned counsel

          for the petitioner submits that it appears from the aforesaid, the

          recovery has been made from the house and Car of co-accused

          person and petitioner has been made accused in the present case

          merely on the ground that the petitioner was present in the

          house of co-accused person and said co-accused person, namely,

          Amit Thakur has been granted bail by this Court vide order

          dated 31.03.2026 passed in Cr. Misc. No.20624 of 2026 and

          several other co-accused persons have also been granted bail by

          this Court and the petitioner is in custody since 10.01.2026.

                       5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer

          for bail of the petitioner.

                       6. Considering the aforesaid fact, petitioner has clean

          antecedent, and the person from whose possession recovery has

          been made, has been granted bail by this Court, let the

          petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail

          bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the

          like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge-I,

          (Excise Act), Darbhanga in connection with Excise P.S. (Sadar)

          Case No. 20 of 2026, with the following conditions:-

                       (I) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21115 of 2026(2) dt.31-03-2026
                                                           3/3




                         properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court

                         and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and

                         on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient

                         reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

                                      (II) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the

                         witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move

                         for cancellation of bail.

                                      (III) And, further condition that the court below shall

                         verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at

                         any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his

                         criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for

                         cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the

                         acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order

                         shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of

                         verification.



                                                (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Nitesh/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.