Patna High Court
Rohit Kumar Sada @ RohitversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- SANDEEP KUMAR
Holding
Bail was granted to the petitioner subject to a bond of Rs.10,000 and two sureties.
Summary
The petitioner, Rohit Kumar Sada, was arrested on 26 October 2025 in connection with a case registered under Sections 363, 366 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly abducting a girl. He applied for bail, claiming innocence and asserting that the victim's statement indicated a consensual relationship. The State opposed the bail application, arguing the seriousness of the alleged offences. The Court examined the facts, the nature of the charges, and the submissions of counsel, and decided to grant bail on the condition of a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount. The order expressly limited its effect to the bail application and did not prejudice the merits of the trial.
Issues considered
- Whether bail should be granted to the accused in a case involving alleged abduction under IPC Sections 363, 366 and 34.
Legislation cited
- Indian Penal Code — s. 34, 363, 366
Subjects
- bail
- kidnapping
- abduction
- Indian Penal Code
- Criminal Procedure
- High Court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21193 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-33 Year-2024 Thana- SINDHIYA District- Samastipur
======================================================
Rohit Kumar Sada @ Rohit S/O Rama Sada @ Ramo Sada R/O Vill.- Dumra,
Basipati, P.S.- Singhiya, Distt- Samastipur
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Patna
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Madhav Kumar
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Rina Sinha
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 06-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with
Singhiya P.S. Case No. 33 of 2024 registered for the offence
under Sections 363, 366/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is
accused of abducting the victim girl.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner is innocent and he is in custody since 26.10.2025.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits
that from the statement of the victim girl, it will appear that the
petitioner and the victim were in a relationship.
6. Learned APP appearing for the State opposes the
prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21193 of 2026(2) dt.06-04-2026
2/2
7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the
case and submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner, let
the petitioner, above named, be released on bail upon furnishing
bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the
like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned concerned
Court below in connection with Singhiya P.S. Case No. 33 of
2024.
8. It is, however, clarified that the observations made
herein are limited to the adjudication of the present bail
application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner at
any subsequent stage of the trial and this Court has not
expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
Vikas/-
U
Checking your session…