Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

HARISHANKAR DUBEY @ BHOLA DUBEYversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner, subject to a cash bond and conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

Summary

Harishankar Dubey was arrested in connection with a case alleging assault and several other offences under the Bihar Negotiable Substances Act (B.N.S.). The prosecution claimed he struck an informant on the neck, causing a superficial injury to the informant's hand. The petitioner argued he was falsely implicated, highlighted the minor nature of the injury, his clean criminal record, and the three‑day delay in filing the case. The court considered these factors, noting the injury was superficial and the possibility of false implication. Consequently, the court ordered that the petitioner be released on bail with a cash bond of Rs.10,000 and two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner given the nature of the alleged offences and the minor injury sustained by the informant
  • Whether the delay in filing the complaint and the petitioner's clean antecedent warrant bail

Subjects

  • bail
  • assault
  • minor injury
  • false implication
  • clean antecedent
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21341 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-32 Year-2026 Thana- SHIVSAGAR District- Rohtas
                 ======================================================
                 Harishankar Dubey @ Bhola Dubey Son of Late Ayodhya Dubey Resident of
                 Village - Mohaniya, P.S.- Shivsagar, District - Rohtas.

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s

                                                       Versus

                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Dr. Harendra Nath Ojha, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Jitendra Kumar Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   10-04-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                   2.    In   the    present      case,     the    petitioner      is

                   apprehending his arrest in connection with Shivsagar P.S. Case

                   No. 32 of 2026 registered for the offences under Sections

                   126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 352, 351(2), 109 & 3(5) of B.N.S.

                                      3. As per prosecution case, the petitioner gave a

                   Hasua blow to the informant on his neck but the informant tried

                   to save himself by putting his left hand on the neck and received

                   injury on his palm. The occurrence took place in the background

                   of the fact that the petitioner earlier used to make commotion

                   under the influence of alcohol and the informant warned that he

                   would be reported to the police.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21341 of 2026(2) dt.10-04-2026
                                            2/3




                            4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

          the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this

          case. All the offences are bailable except Sections 118(1) and

          109 of BNS. But the injury report falsifies the allegation of any

          life threatening injury being inflicted by the petitioner. The

          injury report shows stitched wound on left hand of size 12mm X

          1 1/2 cm on dorsum and ventral region which shows the injury

          is quite superficial. Learned counsel further submits that the

          present case has been instituted after delay of three days without

          any satisfactory explanation and this shows falsity of allegation.

          Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner and

          informant are agnates and are also neighbour. The petitioner is

          having clean antecedent.

                       5. Learned APP opposes the submission made on

          behalf of the petitioner.

                       6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and

          submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the

          minor and superficial nature of injury and also considering the

          clean antecedent of the petitioner and possibility of false

          implication, let the petitioner above named, in the event of his

          arrest or surrender before the court concerned within a period of

          eight weeks from today, be released on bail, on furnishing bail
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21341 of 2026(2) dt.10-04-2026
                                                        3/3




                      bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two

                      sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned

                      Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram/concerned court in

                      connection with Shivsagar P.S. Case No. 32 of 2026, subject to

                      the condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

                      and other following conditions :

                                                      (i) One of the bailors will be a close

                                                      relative of the petitioner.

                                                      (ii) The petitioner will remain present

                                                      on each and every date fixed by the

                                                      court below, if so required by the

                                                      learned trial court.



                                                (Arun Kumar Jha, J)

    DKS/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.