Prince Yadav @ Prince Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21582 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-56 Year-2024 Thana- DHANKUND District- Banka
                 ======================================================
                 Prince Yadav @ Prince Kumar Yadav S/o Pawan Yadav R/o Village-
                 Chakparasi Gautar, Thana- Rajaun, District- Banka

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Ranjan Kumar Jha, Advocate
                 For the State            :      Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   15-05-2026                          Heard the parties.

                                 2. The petitioner is in custody in connection with

                   Dhankund P.S. Case No. 56 of 2024 for the offence punishable

                   under sections 307, 326 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and

                   section 27 of the Arms Act, lodged on 03.06.2024 by the

                   informant, Dayanand Singh.

                                 3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged

                   that his son went to the place where a bridge was under

                   construction. In the meanwhile, the accused persons came,

                   altercation took place and thereafter allegation against this

                   petitioner is of opening fire which hit Pappu Mandal while

                   another bullet stuck in the informant's side. Thereafter, the name

                   of the accused including the petitioner who escaped has come.

                   This led to the FIR.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21582 of 2026(3) dt.15-05-2026
                                            2/3




                       4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

          though allegation is there, he has remained in custody since

          12.02.2025 and charge has been framed on 17.02.2026, if

          granted relief, shall be diligently appearing in trial.

                       5. Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, learned APP opposes

          the prayer submitting that allegation is there against the

          petitioner and the injured was treated at Jawaharlal Nehru

          Medical College and Hospital.

                       6. Considering the submissions of the parties as also

          his period of custody and an undertaking has been given that he

          shall be diligently appearing in trial, in that background, this

          Court is inclined to extend him the privilege of bail.

                       7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing

          bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of

          like amount each to the satisfaction of learned District and

          Additional Sessions Judge-II, Banka,                 in connection with

          Dhankund P.S. Case No. 56 of 2024 subject to the following

          conditions:

                       (i) one of the bailor should be the family

          member/relative of the petitioner who shall provide official

          document (Aadhar Card/Voter Id/Driving License/Pan Card) to

          show his/her bona fide;
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21582 of 2026(3) dt.15-05-2026
                                                        3/3




                                   (ii) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date

                      before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive

                      dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his

                      bail bond by the Trial Court itself;

                                   (iii) the petitioner shall appear before the concerned

                      police station every month for next one year to mark his

                      attendance and at the end of the period a certificate be submitted

                      before the Trial Court;

                                   (iv) the petitioner shall in no way try to induce or

                      promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences,

                      failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for

                      cancellation of the bail bonds;

                                   (v) the petitioner shall desist from committing any

                      criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty

                      to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.



                                                     (Rajiv Roy, J)
vinayak/-

U      T