Patna High Court
Shiva Kumar @ Rohan KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
- Bench
- SANDEEP KUMAR
Holding
The application for regular bail was dismissed.
Summary
The petitioner, Shiva Kumar, was arrested in connection with a robbery alleged under Section 309(4) of the BNS and has been in custody since 16 January 2026. He filed an application for regular bail before the Patna High Court. The prosecution opposed the bail, emphasizing the seriousness of the robbery charge. The Court, after hearing counsel for both sides, found the nature of the allegation warranted denial of bail and dismissed the application. The judgment was limited to the bail application and did not express any view on the merits of the underlying criminal case.
Issues considered
- Whether regular bail should be granted to the accused in a robbery case under Section 309(4) of the BNS.
Legislation cited
- BNS — s. 309(4)
Subjects
- bail
- regular bail
- robbery
- Section 309(4)
- BNS
- high court
- denial of bail
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21671 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-12 Year-2025 Thana- GANGABRIDGE District- Vaishali
======================================================
Shiva Kumar @ Rohan Kumar S/o Sanjay Ray @ Sanjay Kumar R/V -
Jadhua Chisti, PS- Ganga Bridge, Dist- Vaishali
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Eashita Raj
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Mritunjay Kumar Nirala
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 07-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection
with Ganga Bridge P.S. Case No. 12 of 2025 registered for the
offence under Section 309(4) of the BNS.
3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is
accused of committing robbery.
4. The petitioner is in custody since 16.01.2026.
5. Considering the nature of allegation levelled
against the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to
the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, this application is dismissed.
7. It is, however, clarified that the observations
made herein are limited to the adjudication of the present bail
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21671 of 2026(2) dt.07-04-2026
2/2
application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner at
any subsequent stage of the trial and this Court has not
expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
Vikas/-
U
Checking your session…