Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sudarshan NatversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

Holding

Anticipatory bail was granted to Sudarshan Nat but denied to Govinda Nat.

Summary

The petitioners, Sudarshan Nat and Govinda Nat, were named in an FIR (Jalalpur PS Case No.220 of 2025) alleging assault with a sharp weapon and other offences under the BNS, 2023. They applied for anticipatory bail, claiming innocence, a clean criminal record, and that the dispute arose over a minor issue concerning a curtain. The State opposed the bail, especially for Govinda, alleging assault with an iron weapon. The High Court, applying Section 2(1)(d) and Section 482(2) of the BNSS, 2023, granted anticipatory bail to Sudarshan Nat upon surrender within four weeks with a bond of Rs.30,000, but refused anticipatory bail to Govinda Nat. The Court directed the trial court to entertain a regular bail application from Govinda if he surrenders within six weeks, to be decided on merit.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners under Section 2(1)(d) and Section 482(2) of the BNSS, 2023.
  • Whether the nature of the alleged offences and the circumstances justify denial of anticipatory bail to Govinda Nat.

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • regular bail
  • Criminal Procedure
  • Bihar High Court
  • Section 2(1)(d) BNSS
  • Section 482(2) BNSS
  • assault
  • FIR

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21813 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-220 Year-2025 Thana- JALALPUR District- Saran
                 ======================================================
           1.     Sudarshan Nat S/O Late Gafoor Nat R/O Village- Vishupura, P.S- Jalalpur,
                  Dist.- Saran.
           2.    Govinda Nat S/O Sudarshan Nat R/O Village- Vishupura, P.S- Jalalpur,
                 Dist.- Saran.

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Mili Kumari, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Sangeeta Sharma, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   08-04-2026                    Heard Learned Counsel for the petitioners and

                   Learned APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioners are apprehending arrest in a case

                   registered for the offences punishable in connection with

                   Jalalpur P.S. Case No.220 of 2025 under Sections 126(2),

                   115(2), 118(1) 76, 303(2), 109, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the

                   BNS, 2023.

                                3. As per the prosecution, FIR has been lodged against

                   four named accused persons including the petitioners with

                   allegation that they have assaulted the informant and his family

                   members with sharp weapon due to which injury took place.

                                4. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21813 of 2026(2) dt.08-04-2026
                                            2/3




          petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. He

          submits that the allegation against petitioner No.2 is omnibus

          whereas petitioner No.1 has assaulted the on the head of Rikesh

          with Dabia.

                       5. Counsel submits that the criminal antecedent of the

          petitioners is clean. He further submits that the dispute has taken

          place on a petty issue relating to hanging of Tat (a type of

          curtain). He further submits that the petitioners are ready to

          fulfill all the conditions whatsoever shall be imposed upon

          them.

                       6. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for

          bail of the petitioners and submits that petitioner No.1 is an old

          aged person about 55 years having allegation which does not

          constitute any offence, but against the petitioner No.2, the

          allegation of assault by Dabia (weapon of iron).

                       7. In the present facts and circumstances of this case

          and the submissions made above, let the petitioner No.1 namely,

          Sudarshan Nat, be granted bail, in the event of arrest or

          surrender before the Trial Court within a period of 4 weeks from

          today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty

          Thousand) each as mentioned in Section 2(1)(d) of the BNSS,

          2023 to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Saran,
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21813 of 2026(2) dt.08-04-2026
                                                       3/3




                     Chapra, in connection with Jalalpur P.S. Case No.220 of 2025,

                     subject to the conditions as laid down U/s 482(2) of the BNSS,

                     2023.

                                  8. So far as the petitioner No.2, namely, Govinda Nat,

                     is concerned, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail

                     to the petitioner No.2, therefore the bail application of the

                     petitioner No.2 is hereby rejected.

                                  9. However, trial court is directed to consider the

                     regular bail application of the petitioner No.2, namely, Govinda

                     Nat, if he surrenders within six weeks from today and prays for

                     regular bail, then trial court shall pass order on merit without

                     being prejudice of the present order preferably on the same day.



                                                             (Dr. Anshuman, J)
Prakashmani/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.