Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sanjeev Singh @ Guddu SinghversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted regular bail to the petitioner, subject to bond and surety conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Sanjeev Singh, was arrested in connection with a case of assault that resulted in the death of the informant’s son and faced charges under IPC sections 341, 323, 307, 302 and 34. He had been in custody since 19‑11‑2024 and the trial had been delayed, with charges framed only on 06‑03‑2026 and merely one of five witnesses examined. The petitioner claimed innocence, argued that no offence under Section 302 was made out, and highlighted the prolonged detention and trial delay. The State opposed the bail application. Considering the length of custody, the delay in trial, and the prima facie nature of the allegations, the court allowed the regular bail, directing the petitioner to furnish a bail bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties and to appear regularly in court. The order was made subject to conditions and clarified that the observations were not a determination on the merits of the case.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail should be granted to the petitioner despite serious charges of murder and assault, given the prolonged period of custody and delay in trial proceedings
  • Whether the facts alleged constitute an offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • regular bail
  • delay in trial
  • IPC offences
  • murder
  • assault
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21960 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-108 Year-2024 Thana- LALGANJ District- Vaishali
                 ======================================================
                 Sanjeev Singh @ Guddu Singh S/o- Late Bhola Singh R/v- Wafapur Sharma
                 Ps- Lalganj Dist- Vaishali

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Kumar Mangalam, Advocate
                                                   Mr. Mirtunjay Kumar, Advocate
                                                   Ms. Shilpa Kumari
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Rajesh Kumar
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   09-04-2026                   Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the

                   learned APP for the State.

                                 2. This is the 2nd attempt of the petitioner for regular

                   bail in connection with Lalganj P.S. Case No. 108 of 2024

                   registered for the offence under Section(s) 341, 323, 307,

                   302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

                                 3. Earlier the prayer of the petitioner was rejected by a

                   co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 18625 of 2025

                   dated 13.08.2025.

                                 4. According to FIR, the accused persons including

                   the petitioner, brutally assaulted the informant's son with lathi,

                   danda, brick-bat, etc. They also assaulted the informant. Later

                   on, his son died in course of treatment.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21960 of 2026(3) dt.09-04-2026
                                            2/3




                       5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

          petitioner is innocent and has not committed any offence.

          Petitioner is in custody since 19.11.2024. It is further submitted

          that the trial has been delayed by the prosecution. The charges

          were framed on 06.03.2026 and out of five witnesses, only one

          witness has been examined. It is further submitted that the date

          of occurrence is 01.05.2024 and thereafter, the deceased went

          for treatment; he was treated and came back and subsequently,

          on the next day he died. He also submits that no offence under

          Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code is made out in the facts of

          the case.

                       6. Learned A.P.P. has vehemently opposed the prayer

          for bail.

                       7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances,

          the period of custody and the delay in trial, this application for

          regular bail is allowed.

                       8. Accordingly, let the petitioner, above named, be

          released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten

          Thousand)with two sureties of the like amount each to the

          satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is

          pending/successor Court in connection with Lalganj P.S. Case

          No. 108 of 2024 subject to condition that:-
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21960 of 2026(3) dt.09-04-2026
                                                        3/3




                                                         (i). The petitioner shall appear in
                                              the trial regularly either personally or
                                              through his lawyer and shall cooperate in
                                              the trial and non-cooperation in the trial
                                              shall result in cancellation of the bail bond
                                              of the petitioner.


                                   9. It is made clear that any observation made herein is

                      prima facie in nature and limited solely for the purpose of

                      adjudication of the present bail application. Such observations

                      shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case

                      and shall not influence the trial or any other proceedings in any

                      manner.



                                                         (Sandeep Kumar, J)
Shishir/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.