Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ruba DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court allowed the petition for anticipatory bail, directing release on bail bond subject to Section 482(2) conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Ruba Devi, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case (PS No. 535 of 2025) alleging she assaulted an informant, invoking Sections 109(1), 115(2), 126(2), 303(2), 352, 191(2) and 329(3) of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged head injuries, while the petitioner claimed innocence, citing simple injuries and a clean record. The State opposed the bail. Considering the minor nature of the alleged injuries and the petitioner's clean antecedents, the court granted anticipatory bail, directing that if arrested within eight weeks she be released on a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S. in view of the alleged offences and the facts of the case

Legislation cited

  • B.N.S. — s. 109(1), 115(2), 126(2), 191(2), 303(2), 329(3), 352, 482(2)

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Section 482
  • clean antecedents
  • assault
  • bail bond
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21974 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-535 Year-2025 Thana- BALIYA District- Begusarai
                 ======================================================
                 Ruba Devi W/O Mahesh Chaudhary R/O Village - Bari Ballia, Siraja, Ward
                 No.- 9, P.S- Ballia, District- Begusarai

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus

                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner       :        Mr. Sandip Kumar Gautam, Advocate
                 For the State            :        Mr. Mohammed Arif, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   15-04-2026                  Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

                                2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case

                   registered for the offence punishable under Sections 109(1),

                   115(2), 126(2), 303(2), 352, 191(2) and 329(3) of the B.N.S..

                                3. As per prosecution case, this petitioner is alleged to

                   have assaulted on the head of informant.

                                4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on

                   behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has

                   committed no offence. Doctor has found the injuries, allegedly

                   caused by this petitioner, simple in nature. Petitioner is a lady

                   and claims clean antecedents.

                                5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21974 of 2026(2) dt.15-04-2026
                                                         2/2




                       opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the

                       petitioner.

                                     6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the

                       case, nature of injuries allegedly caused by this petitioner and

                       clean antecedents of the petitioner, the prayer for grant of

                       anticipatory bail to the petitioner is allowed.

                                     7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within

                       a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named

                       petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.

                       10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

                       each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate,

                       Begusarai in connection with Ballia (Balliya) P.S. Case No. 535

                       of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2)

                       of the B.N.S.S..



                                             (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
shashank/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.