Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Manju Devi @ Shanti DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail was granted to the petitioner subject to specified conditions.

Summary

Manju Devi, also known as Shanti Devi, was arrested in connection with a dowry‑related homicide case (Hathauri P.S. Case No. 151 of 2021) and charged under Sections 304B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. She sought bail, claiming a clean antecedent, no involvement in any assault or dowry demand, and that the FIR was fabricated; she is the step‑mother‑in‑law of the deceased and lives separately from the family. The prosecution opposed the bail application. The court noted the petitioner’s clean record, the absence of specific allegations against her, and the fact that a similarly situated co‑accused (her husband) had previously been granted bail. Accordingly, the court granted bail on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions of cooperation, appearance, non‑tampering with evidence, and verification of criminal antecedent. The bail order was directed to be implemented by the Judicial Magistrate of Muzaffarpur.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused under Sections 304B and 34 IPC in view of the facts and her antecedents

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • dowry death
  • culpable homicide
  • Indian Penal Code
  • Section 304B
  • Section 34
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22338 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-151 Year-2021 Thana- HATHAURI District- Muzaffarpur
                 ======================================================
                 Manju Devi @ Shanti Devi W/O Lalbabu Sahni R/O Village - Dakrama, P. S -
                 Hathauri, District - Muzaffarpur

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Devendra Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Mohammed Arif, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   06-04-2026                    Heard Mr. Devendra Kumar, learned counsel for the

                   petitioner and Mr. Mohammed Arif, learned Additional Public

                   Prosecutor for the State.

                               2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since

                   26.12.2025 in connection with Hathauri P.S. Case No. 151 of

                   2021, F.I.R. dated 05.07.2021 for the offences punishable under

                   Sections 304(B)/34 of the IPC.

                               3. According to prosecution case, this petitioner along

                   with other accused persons have killed the informant's daughter

                   due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.

                               4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner has clean antecedent and she has falsely been

                   implicated in the present case. The allegation as alleged in the

                   FIR is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not committed
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22338 of 2026(2) dt.06-04-2026
                                            2/3




          any offence as alleged in the FIR. There is no allegation of

          assault, overt act or demand of dowry against the petitioner. He

          further submits that the petitioner is step mother-in-law of the

          deceased and she is living separately from the deceased and she

          has no concern at all from the deceased or her family affairs. He

          further submits that the police after investigation submitted the

          charge sheet against the petitioner. He further submits that

          similarly situated, co-accused, namely, Lal Babu Sahani who is

          husband of the petitioner has been granted bail by a co-ordinate

          Bench of this Court vide order dated 19.07.2023 passed in Cr.

          Misc. No. 38596 of 2023. The petitioner is in custody since

          26.12.2025.

                      5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has

          vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

                       6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

          that the petitioner has clean antecedent, there is no allegation of

          assault or demand of dowry against her and similarly situated

          co-accused has been granted bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this

          Court, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on

          furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two

          sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

          Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Muzaffarpur (East), Court No.14 in
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22338 of 2026(2) dt.06-04-2026
                                                        3/3




                      connection with Hathauri P.S. Case No. 151 of 2021, subject to

                      the following conditions:-

                                   i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be

                      properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court

                      and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and

                      on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient

                      reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

                                   ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the

                      witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to

                      move for cancellation of bail.

                                   iii. And further condition that the court below shall

                      verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at

                      any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his

                      criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for

                      cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the

                      acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order

                      shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of

                      verification.



                                             (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Vanisha/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.