Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Renu Kumari @ Renu DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The petition for transfer of the criminal case is dismissed, and the trial shall continue in the Court of ACJM‑I, Saran.

Summary

The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous petition seeking transfer of a case (Taraiya PS Case No. 237 of 2022) involving offences under Sections 498(A), 341, 323, 325, 379, 354/34 of the IPC and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act from the Court of ACJM‑I, Saran (Chapra) to the Court of CJM, Gopalganj. The opposite party argued that the trial was at its final stage, with all prosecution witnesses examined and only the doctor and investigating officer yet to be examined, making transfer unnecessary. The petitioner’s counsel disclosed lack of instructions from the client for six months. The Court observed that the evidence of the petitioner and other prosecution witnesses was already completed and only a few witnesses remained, and therefore found no merit in transferring the case. Consequently, the petition was dismissed and the Court directed the ACJM‑I, Saran to expedite the remaining proceedings.

Issues considered

  • Whether a criminal case pending before ACJM‑I, Saran should be transferred to CJM, Gopalganj at the stage where prosecution evidence is largely completed

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • criminal procedure
  • transfer of trial
  • jurisdiction
  • IPC offences
  • Dowry Prohibition Act
  • expeditious trial

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22481 of 2025
                                                      In
                               Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1212 of 2024
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-237 Year-2022 Thana- TARAIYA District- Saran
                 ======================================================
                 Renu Kumari @ Renu Devi Wife of Baleshwar Rai Resident of Village -
                 Galimapur, P.S. - Taraiya, District - Saran. Address at Present - Village -
                 Faijullahpur, P.S. - Baikunthpur, District - Gopalganj

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.    Baleshwar Rai Son of Bhrigunath Rai Resident of Village - Galimapur, P.S. -
                 Taraiya, District - Saran.

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Shubhangi Pandey, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, Adv.
                 For the State            :        Mr. Ajay Kumar Jha, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

6   10-02-2026                  Heard both the parties.

                                02. The present petition has been filed for transfer of

                   case arising out of Taraiya P.S. Case No. 237 of 2022 lodged

                   under Sections 498(A), 341, 323, 325, 379, 354/34 of the IPC

                   and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act pending in the

                   court of learned ACJM-I, Saran at Chapra to the Court of CJM,

                   Gopalganj.

                                02. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   opposite party submits that the case before the learned ACJM-I,

                   Saran at Chapra is at its fag end as all prosecution witnesses

                   have been examined and only doctor and investigating officer is
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22481 of 2025(6) dt.10-02-2026
                                                         2/2




                       to be examined. Therefore, no useful purpose would be served

                       in transferring the matter from Saran at Chapra to Gopalganj.

                                    03. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                       petitioner submits that he has no instruction in this regard as he

                       is not in contact with his client for last six months.

                                    04. Since the evidence of petitioner and other

                       prosecution witnesses has been completed and the matter

                       remains only for examination of doctor and the investigating

                       officer as submitted by learned counsel for the opposite party, I

                       am not inclined to transfer the case arising out of Taraiya P.S.

                       Case No. 237 of 2022 pending in the Court of learned ACJM-I,

                       Saran at Chapra.

                                    05. Therefore, the present criminal miscellaneous

                       petition is disposed of while directing the learned ACJM-I,

                       Saran at Chapra to expeditiously proceed in the matter and

                       dispose it of at the earliest.



                                                 (Arun Kumar Jha, J)
Anuradha/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.