Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Biran ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL REJECTED

Holding

Anticipatory bail was denied to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Biran Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS Case No. 296 of 2021) under Sections 30(a) and 37(b) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, where 10 litres of illicit liquor were recovered. The petitioner claimed he was innocent, not caught in possession, and not apprehended on the spot, but the State highlighted his prior pending criminal case of a similar nature. The learned counsel for the State opposed bail, emphasizing the petitioner’s unclean antecedent. The Court examined the facts and, considering the seriousness of the offence and the petitioner’s criminal history, declined to grant anticipatory bail. Consequently, the Court ordered the petitioner to surrender within six weeks and directed the trial court to consider any bail application on merits thereafter.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 in view of the alleged recovery of illicit liquor and his prior criminal antecedent.

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • illicit liquor
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • criminal antecedent
  • bail jurisprudence
  • Criminal Procedure Code

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22621 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-296 Year-2021 Thana- BARAULI District- Gopalganj
                 ======================================================
                 Biran Manjhi S/o Bhulan Manjhi Resident of Village- Kahla, P.S.- Barauli,
                 District- Gopalganj

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Vikash Kumar Shukla, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Mritunjay Kumar Nirala, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   16-04-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection

                   with Barauli P.S. Case No. 296 of 2021, dated 10.10.2021,

                   lodged under Sections 30(a) & 37(b)of the Bihar Prohibition

                   and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, pending before the Court

                   of Additional District and Sessions Judge 13th cum Special

                   Excise Court No. 1, Gopalganj.

                                3. As per the prosecution, total recovery of 10 litres of

                   illicit liquor has been made, which is the subject matter of the

                   present case.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Counsel

                   further submits that the petitioner was neither apprehended from
         Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22621 of 2026(2) dt.16-04-2026
                                                     2/2




                   the spot nor was anything illicit recovered from his possession.

                   Counsel also submits that the criminal antecedent of the

                   petitioner is not clean, as there is one criminal case pending

                   against him.

                                5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for

                   bail of the petitioner and submits that the criminal antecedent of

                   the petitioner is not clean, as there is one criminal case of the

                   same nature pending against him.

                                6. In the present facts and circumstances, this Court is

                   not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

                   Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is

                   hereby rejected.

                                7. It is directed to the petitioner to surrender before

                   the Trial Court within a period of 6 weeks from today. In case,

                   the petitioner surrenders within six weeks, then the Trial Court

                   is directed to pass order on his surrender-cum-bail application

                   on the same day without being prejudice that the anticipatory

                   bail of the petitioner has been rejected by this Court and the

                   Trial Court shall pass order on the merit of this case.



                                                                    (Dr. Anshuman, J.)
Aman Kumar/-
U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.