Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Kulbhushan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to the stipulated conditions.

Summary

Kulbhushan Kumar sought anticipatory bail after the police lodged a case (Arariya Sangram P.S. Case No. 93 of 2025) alleging his involvement in the possession and recovery of 450 litres of illicit liquor, offences punishable under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. The petitioner contended that he was not named in the FIR, that the seized vehicle belonged to him but had already been sold, and that he had a clean antecedent. The State opposed the bail. The High Court, applying the provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita on anticipatory bail, granted the petitioner anticipatory bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.1,50,000, subject to conditions including family‑member surety, regular appearance before the trial court, and verification of any concealed criminal antecedents. The order directed the trial court to verify the petitioner’s antecedents but not to delay acceptance of the bail bond.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under Sections 2(1)(d) and 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
  • Whether the petitioner’s alleged involvement in the illicit liquor case, despite not being named in the FIR, justifies denial of bail.
  • Whether the conditions imposed by the court are appropriate and lawful.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • illicit liquor
  • excise law
  • criminal procedure
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • bail conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22674 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-93 Year-2025 Thana- Araria Sangram District- Madhubani
                 ======================================================
                 Kulbhushan Kumar S/o- Suresh Jha Resident of Village- Bishanpur
                 Srirampur, P.S.-Titara Asanan. District- Muzaffarpur.
                                                                              ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                     Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                       ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Sushil Kumar Jha, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Narsingh Tanti, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   16-04-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection

                   with Arariya Sangram P.S. Case No. 93 of 2025 (GR No.

                   804/2025) lodged on 28.12.2025, for the offence punishable

                   under Sections 274, 275 & 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita,

                   2023 and section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act,

                   2016.

                                3. As per the prosecution, FIR has been lodged against

                   one named accused person and owner of a vehicle. Total

                   recovery of 450 litres of illicit liquor has been made, which is

                   the subject matter of the present case.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Counsel

                   submits that nothing has been recovered from the conscious
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22674 of 2026(2) dt.16-04-2026
                                            2/3




          possession of the petitioner and the alleged recovery has been

          made from the car. Counsel further submits that petitioner is not

          named in the FIR and he has been falsely implicated in this case

          due to the reason that the seized car belongs to petitioner which

          he already sold to other person. Counsel further submits that the

          petitioner has clean antecedent.

                       5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for

          bail of the petitioner.

                       6. In the present facts and circumstances of this case,

          let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail,

          in the event of arrest or surrender before the Trial Court within a

          period of 4 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of

          Rs.1,50,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Fifty Thousand) as mentioned

          in Section 2(1)(d) of the B.N.S.S., 2023 to the satisfaction of

          Special Judge (Excise), Act, Jhanjharpur, in connection with

          Arariya Sangram P.S. Case No. 93 of 2025 (GR No. 804/2025),

          subject to the conditions as laid down U/s 482(2) of the

          B.N.S.S., 2023 with further conditions:-

                       (i) one of the bailors should be the family member of

          the petitioner who shall provide official document to show

          his/her bona fide;

                       (ii) the petitioner shall appear before the Trial Court
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22674 of 2026(2) dt.16-04-2026
                                                         3/3




                       on each and every scheduled date, and failure to do so for two

                       consecutive dates without any plausible reason/explanation shall

                       be resulted into cancellation of his bail bonds by the Trial Court

                       itself;

                                    7. The Trial Court is directed to verify the criminal

                       antecedent(s) of the petitioner, and in case, it is found at any

                       stage that the petitioner has concealed the fact about his criminal

                       antecedent(s), the Trial Court shall take steps for cancellation of

                       bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of the bail

                       bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be

                       delayed for the purpose of or in the name of verification.



                                                                      (Dr. Anshuman, J)
Divyansh/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.