Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Mala DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted bail to the petitioner with a bond of Rs.10,000 and imposed conditions for her cooperation and non‑tampering.

Summary

Mala Devi, the petitioner, was arrested on 23 December 2025 in connection with a dowry‑related death case (Bhawanipur P.S. Case No. 284 of 2025) under Sections 80 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. She claimed to have a clean record and argued that the FIR lacked specific allegations against her, noting that she was implicated merely as the mother‑in‑law of the deceased. The State opposed bail, while her counsel contended that the informant was not an eyewitness and the charges were omnibus. The Court examined the facts, the nature of the allegations, and the petitioner’s antecedents, and decided to grant bail on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions of cooperation, appearance, non‑tampering with evidence, and verification of criminal antecedents. The bail order emphasized that any violation of conditions could lead to cancellation.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner under Sections 80 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. in a dowry‑death case
  • Whether the petitioner poses a risk of fleeing, tampering with evidence, or influencing witnesses
  • Whether the FIR contains specific allegations sufficient to deny bail

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • dowry death
  • torture
  • false implication
  • criminal antecedent
  • conditions of bail

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22684 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-284 Year-2025 Thana- Bhawanipur District- Bhagalpur
                 ======================================================
                 Mala Devi W/O Kalanand Das R/O Village- Bhawanipur, P.S.- Bhawanipur,
                 District- Bhagalpur

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Ranjan Kumar Jha, Advocate
                 For the State            :        Mr. Brajendra Nath Pandey, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   07-04-2026                     Heard Mr. Ranjan Kumar Jha, learned counsel for

                   the petitioner and Mr. Brajendra Nath Pandey, learned APP for

                   the State.

                                 2. Petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since

                   23.12.2025, in connection with Bhawanipur P.S. Case No. 284

                   of 2025, F.I.R. dated 22.12.2025 registered for the offences

                   punishable under Sections 80, 3(5) of the B.N.S.

                                 3. Allegation against the petitioner is of committing

                   torture and caused death due to non-fulfillment of demand of

                   dowry.

                                 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner has clean antecedent and she has been falsely

                   implicated in the present case. It appears from the F.I.R. itself

                   that the informant is not an eye witness of the alleged
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22684 of 2026(2) dt.07-04-2026
                                            2/3




          occurrence and petitioner has been made accused merely on the

          ground that the petitioner is mother-in-law of the deceased.

          From perusal of the F.I.R. it appears that there is no specific

          allegation of any assault or overt act or demand of dowry

          attributed against the petitioner rather there is general and

          omnibus allegation against all the accused persons including the

          petitioner except the husband of the deceased and husband of

          the deceased, namely, Arjan Kumar is in judicial custody. He

          further submits that the police after investigation submitted

          chargesheet against the petitioner and the petitioner is in custody

          since 23.12.2025.

                        5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the

          State has vehemently opposed the prayer for               bail of the

          petitioner.

                        6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the

          case, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on

          furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand)

          with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

          learned A.C.J.M. III, Naugachia, Bhagalpur in connection with

          Bhawanipur P.S. Case No. 284 of 2025, subject to the following

          conditions :-

                        (1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22684 of 2026(2) dt.07-04-2026
                                                           3/3




                         properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court

                         and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and

                         on her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient

                         reason, her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

                                      (2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the

                         witness, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move

                         for cancellation of bail.

                                      (3) And, further condition that the court below shall

                         verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at

                         any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed her

                         criminal antecedents, the court below shall take step for

                         cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner.             However, the

                         acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order

                         shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of

                         verification.



                                                                       (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Ibrar//-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.